• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Service evaluation of MyChristie-MyHealth, an electronic patient reported outcome measure integrated into clinical cancer care

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Shipman, Lee
    Chan, Clara
    Faivre-Finn, Corinne
    Fenemore, Jackie
    Harris, Maggie A
    Salem, Ahmed
    Sheikh, Hamid Y
    Woolf, David K
    Affiliation
    Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester
    Issue Date
    2022
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Introduction: Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (ePROMs) are multidimensional, digitalised health questionnaires sent to patients in order to assess their subjective experience of health and disease. They are becoming particularly prevalent in cancer care, where patients may experience wide-ranging symptoms and side-effects. MyChristie-MyHealth is the ePROM established into routine care at the Christie NHS Foundation Trust in 2019. We conducted an evaluation of this service in order to identify key barriers to its use, and also potential strategies for improvement. Methods: Data collection: Patients who had opted out of completing ePROMs (n=87) and who had completed at least one ePROM (n=87) were identified. Collected data included age, occupation, diagnosis and treatment intent. Semi-structured Interviews: Held with Non-completers (n=30) and Completers (n=31) of ePROMs, as well as clinician users (n=6). Questions covered themes such as accessibility, acceptability and usefulness, and ways in which the service could be improved. Results: Non-completers of ePROMs were older (median age 72 vs 66 years, p=0.005), had a history of unemployment or manual type work (86% vs 58%, p=0.003), on treatment with curative intent (OR 1.448, p=0.045) and less likely to be in a clinical trial (OR 0.531, p=0.011) (see Fig. 1). They shared some common misconceptions, such as that the invite link may have been a scam, and had reluctance with technology, but willing to complete ePROMs via email rather than Smartphone. Completers of ePROMs wanted their results to be acknowledged by their clinicians, and thought that inclusion of white-space response boxes would be an improvement. Clinicians wanted ePROM results to be displayed in a more user-friendly way Conclusions: We have broadly characterised non-completers of ePROMs in order to identify those in need of extra support or encouragement in the clinic. An action plan resulting from this review will inform the future development of MyChristie-MyHealth.
    Citation
    Shipman L, Chan C, Faivre-Finn C, Fenemore J, Harris M, Salem A, et al. Service evaluation of MyChristie-MyHealth, an electronic patient reported outcome measure integrated into clinical cancer care. Vol. 165, Lung Cancer. Elsevier BV; 2022. p. S66.
    Journal
    Lung Cancer
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/625255
    DOI
    10.1016/S0169-5002(22)00191-X
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5002(22)00191-X
    Type
    Meetings and Proceedings
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/S0169-5002(22)00191-X
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.