Correlation between treatment effects on response rate and progression-free survival and overall survival in trials of targeted therapies in molecularly enriched populations
Authors
Solomon, B. J.Loong, H. H.
Summers, Y.
Thomas, Z. M.
French, P.
Lin, B. K.
Sashegyi, A.
Wolf, J.
Yang, J. C.
Drilon, A.
Affiliation
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: Ben.Solomon@petermac.org. Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR. The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK. Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA. Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO), Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany. Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.Issue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background The number of randomized trials of agents targeting oncogene-addicted tumors has surged in the past 10 years. Using a meta-analysis, we explored whether improvements in objective response rate (ORR) in comparative trials using targeted agents could serve as a potential surrogate endpoint for improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in populations with oncogene-addicted cancer. Patients and methods Using commercial text mining software I2E, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov and MEDLINE databases for randomized, phase III trials based on prospectively defined criteria, including (i) use of agents targeting EGFR activating mutations, ALK rearrangements, BRAF V600E or V600K mutations, and BCR-ABL fusion protein; (ii) molecularly enriched trial population or subpopulation; (iii) control arm only randomized to chemo/cytotoxic therapy. Correlative analyses were performed using ORR, OS, and PFS data from trials that met these criteria. Results A total of 62 trials were identified; 15 met all of the prespecified criteria. The ORR effect size (both the difference in ORR between arms and the log odds ratio) and log PFS hazard ratio were strongly correlated: –0.78 (P = 0.0007) for the ORR difference model; –0.74 (P = 0.0017) for the log odds ratio model. ORR effect size was positively correlated with the log OS hazard ratio, but more weakly: –0.67 (P = 0.013) for the ORR difference model and –0.58 (P = 0.036) for the log odds ratio model. Analysis of the treatment effects between OS and PFS found no correlation. Conclusions These analyses identified a strong correlation between treatment effects on ORR and PFS in randomized clinical trials investigating agents targeting oncogene-driven cancers. A weaker correlation was observed between ORR and OS. These meta-analysis results support the use of a high ORR forming the basis of an initial regulatory approval in biomarker-driven studies.Citation
Solomon BJ, Loong HH, Summers Y, Thomas ZM, French P, Lin BK, et al. Correlation between treatment effects on response rate and progression-free survival and overall survival in trials of targeted therapies in molecularly enriched populations [Internet]. Vol. 7, ESMO Open. Elsevier BV; 2022. p. 100398.Journal
ESMO OpenDOI
10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100398PubMed ID
35183043Additional Links
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100398Type
ArticleLanguage
enae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100398