Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy
Name:
Harrison CN.pdf
Size:
394.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Identified with Open Access button
Authors
Harrison, C. N.Garcia, J. S.
Somervaille, Tim C P
Foran, J. M.
Verstovsek, S.
Jamieson, C.
Mesa, R.
Ritchie, E. K.
Tantravahi, S. K.
Vachhani, P.
O'Connell, C. L.
Komrokji, R. S.
Harb, J.
Hutti, J. E.
Holes, L.
Masud, A. A.
Nuthalapati, S.
Potluri, J.
Pemmaraju, N.
Affiliation
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA. The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom. Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA. University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT. O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, Birmingham, AL. University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL. AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL.Issue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
PURPOSE Targeting the BCL-XL pathway has demonstrated the ability to overcome Janus kinase inhibitor resistance in preclinical models. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of adding BCL-XL/BCL-2 inhibitor navitoclax to ruxolitinib therapy in patients with myelofibrosis with progression or suboptimal response to ruxolitinib monotherapy (NCT03222609). METHODS Thirty-four adult patients with intermediate-/high-risk myelofibrosis who had progression or suboptimal response on stable ruxolitinib dose (≥ 10 mg twice daily) were administered navitoclax at 50 mg once daily starting dose, followed by escalation to a maximum of 300 mg once daily in once in weekly increments (if platelets were ≥ 75 × 109/L). The primary end point was ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction (SVR35) from baseline at week 24. Secondary end points included ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS50) from baseline at week 24, hemoglobin improvement, change in bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) grade, and safety. RESULTS High molecular risk mutations were identified in 58% of patients, and 52% harbored ≥ 3 mutations. SVR35 was achieved by 26.5% of patients at week 24, and by 41%, at any time on study, with an estimated median duration of SVR35 of 13.8 months. TSS50 was achieved by 30% (6 of 20) of patients at week 24, and BMF improved by 1-2 grades in 33% (11 of 33) of evaluable patients. Anemia response was achieved by 64% (7 of 11), including one patient with baseline transfusion dependence. Median overall survival was not reached with a median follow-up of 21.6 months. The most common adverse event was reversible thrombocytopenia without clinically significant bleeding (88%). CONCLUSION The addition of navitoclax to ruxolitinib in patients with persistent or progressive myelofibrosis resulted in durable SVR35, improved TSS, hemoglobin response, and BMF. Further investigation is underway to qualify the potential for disease modification.Citation
Harrison CN, Garcia JS, Somervaille TCP, Foran JM, Verstovsek S, Jamieson C, et al. Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy [Internet]. Journal of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO); 2022.Journal
J Clin OncolDOI
10.1200/jco.21.02188PubMed ID
35180010Additional Links
https://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.21.02188Type
ArticleLanguage
enae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1200/jco.21.02188
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Addition of navitoclax to ongoing ruxolitinib treatment in patients with myelofibrosis (REFINE): a post-hoc analysis of molecular biomarkers in a phase 2 study.
- Authors: Pemmaraju N, Garcia JS, Potluri J, Harb JG, Sun Y, Jung P, Qin QQ, Tantravahi SK, Verstovsek S, Harrison C
- Issue date: 2022 Jun
- Pacritinib vs Best Available Therapy, Including Ruxolitinib, in Patients With Myelofibrosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Authors: Mascarenhas J, Hoffman R, Talpaz M, Gerds AT, Stein B, Gupta V, Szoke A, Drummond M, Pristupa A, Granston T, Daly R, Al-Fayoumi S, Callahan JA, Singer JW, Gotlib J, Jamieson C, Harrison C, Mesa R, Verstovsek S
- Issue date: 2018 May 1
- Interim analysis of safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis and low platelet counts.
- Authors: Talpaz M, Paquette R, Afrin L, Hamburg SI, Prchal JT, Jamieson K, Terebelo HR, Ortega GL, Lyons RM, Tiu RV, Winton EF, Natrajan K, Odenike O, Claxton D, Peng W, O'Neill P, Erickson-Viitanen S, Leopold L, Sandor V, Levy RS, Kantarjian HM, Verstovsek S
- Issue date: 2013 Oct 29
- Efficacy and safety of fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (FREEDOM2): results from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.
- Authors: Harrison CN, Mesa R, Talpaz M, Al-Ali HK, Xicoy B, Passamonti F, Palandri F, Benevolo G, Vannucchi AM, Mediavilla C, Iurlo A, Kim I, Rose S, Brown P, Hernandez C, Wang J, Kiladjian JJ
- Issue date: 2024 Oct
- MANIFEST: Pelabresib in Combination With Ruxolitinib for Janus Kinase Inhibitor Treatment-Naïve Myelofibrosis.
- Authors: Mascarenhas J, Kremyanskaya M, Patriarca A, Palandri F, Devos T, Passamonti F, Rampal RK, Mead AJ, Hobbs G, Scandura JM, Talpaz M, Granacher N, Somervaille TCP, Hoffman R, Wondergem MJ, Salama ME, Colak G, Cui J, Kiladjian JJ, Vannucchi AM, Verstovsek S, Curto-García N, Harrison C, Gupta V
- Issue date: 2023 Nov 10