Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGaito, S.
dc.contributor.authorBurnet, N.
dc.contributor.authorAznar, M.
dc.contributor.authorCrellin, A.
dc.contributor.authorIndelicato, D. J.
dc.contributor.authorIngram, S.
dc.contributor.authorPan, S.
dc.contributor.authorPrice, G.
dc.contributor.authorHwang, E.
dc.contributor.authorFrance, A.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, E.
dc.contributor.authorWhitfield, G.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T11:44:41Z
dc.date.available2022-02-22T11:44:41Z
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.identifier.citationGaito S, Burnet N, Aznar M, Crellin A, Indelicato DJ, Ingram S, et al. Normal Tissue Complication Probability Modelling for Toxicity Prediction and Patient Selection in Proton Beam Therapy to the Central Nervous System: A Literature Review. Clinical Oncology. Elsevier BV; 2022.en
dc.identifier.pmid35042622en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clon.2021.12.015en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/625074
dc.description.abstractNormal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models can guide clinical decision making in radiotherapy. In recent years, they have been used for patient selection for proton beam therapy (PBT) for some anatomical tumour sites. This review synthesizes the published evidence regarding the use of NTCP models to predict the toxicity of PBT, for different end points in patients with brain tumours. A search of Medline and Embase using the Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) criteria was undertaken. In total, 37 articles were deemed relevant and were reviewed in detail. Nineteen articles on NTCP modelling of toxicity end points were included. Of these, 11 were comparative NTCP studies of PBT versus conventional photon radiotherapy (XRT), which evaluated differences in plan dosimetry and then assumed that XRT-derived literature estimates of NTCP would be applicable to both. Seven papers derived NTCP models based on PBT outcome data, two of which provided model parameters. Among analysed end points, the reduced risk of secondary tumours with PBT as compared with XRT is estimated – through modelling studies – to be considerable and was highlighted by most authors. For other analysed end points, the clinical benefit of PBT mainly depends on tumour location in relation to organs at risk as well as prescription doses. NTCP models can be useful tools for treatment plan comparison. However, most published toxicity data were derived from XRT cohorts; this review has highlighted the need for further studies relating dose-volume parameters to observed toxicity in PBT-treated patients. Specifically, there is a need for PBT-specific NTCP models that can be implemented in the clinical practice. NTCP models built on robust clinical data for the most common radiotherapy toxicities in the brain would potentially redefine the current indications for PBT.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2021.12.015en
dc.titleNormal Tissue Complication Probability Modelling for Toxicity Prediction and Patient Selection in Proton Beam Therapy to the Central Nervous System: A Literature Reviewen
dc.typeOtheren
dc.contributor.departmentProton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: Simona.gaito@nhs.net. Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; NHS England National Clinical Lead Proton Beam Therapy, UK. University of Florida Department of Radiation Oncology, Jacksonville, Florida, USA. Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.en
dc.identifier.journalClin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)en
dc.description.noteen]


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record