Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWaqar, M.
dc.contributor.authorTrifiletti, D. M.
dc.contributor.authorMcBain, C.
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, J.
dc.contributor.authorCoope, D. J.
dc.contributor.authorAkkari, L.
dc.contributor.authorQuinones-Hinojosa, A.
dc.contributor.authorBorst, G. R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T11:44:38Z
dc.date.available2022-02-22T11:44:38Z
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.identifier.citationWaqar M, Trifiletti DM, McBain C, O’Connor J, Coope DJ, Akkari L, et al. Early Therapeutic Interventions for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Rationale and Review of the Literature. Current Oncology Reports. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 2022.en
dc.identifier.pmid35119629en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11912-021-01157-0en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/625059
dc.description.abstractPurpose of Review Glioblastoma is the commonest primary brain cancer in adults whose outcomes are amongst the worst of any cancer. The current treatment pathway comprises surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy though unresectable diffusely infiltrative tumour cells remain untreated for several weeks post-diagnosis. Intratumoural heterogeneity combined with increased hypoxia in the postoperative tumour microenvironment potentially decreases the efficacy of adjuvant interventions and fails to prevent early postoperative regrowth, called rapid early progression (REP). In this review, we discuss the clinical implications and biological foundations of post-surgery REP. Subsequently, clinical interventions potentially targeting this phenomenon are reviewed systematically. Recent Findings Early interventions include early systemic chemotherapy, neoadjuvant immunotherapy, local therapies delivered during surgery (including Gliadel wafers, nanoparticles and stem cell therapy) and several radiotherapy techniques. We critically appraise and compare these strategies in terms of their efficacy, toxicity, challenges and potential to prolong survival. Finally, we discuss the most promising strategies that could benefit future glioblastoma patients. Summary There is biological rationale to suggest that early interventions could improve the outcome of glioblastoma patients and they should be investigated in future trials.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01157-0en
dc.titleEarly Therapeutic Interventions for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Rationale and Review of the Literatureen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Academic Neurological Surgery, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health and Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Mayo 1N, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA. Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Dept 58, Floor 2a, Room 21-2-13, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK. Division of Tumour Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health and Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Gerben.Borst@nhs.net. Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Dept 58, Floor 2a, Room 21-2-13, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK. Gerben.Borst@nhs.net.en
dc.identifier.journalCurrent Oncology Reportsen
dc.description.noteen]
refterms.dateFOA2022-04-20T11:30:26Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Waqar2022_Article_EarlyTherape ...
Size:
1.146Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
From UNPAYWALL

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record