Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMileshkin, L.
dc.contributor.authorKarapetyan, A. R.
dc.contributor.authorBeringer, A.
dc.contributor.authorBochtler, T.
dc.contributor.authorChalabi, N.
dc.contributor.authorCook, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorDuran-Pacheco, G.
dc.contributor.authorGolding, S.
dc.contributor.authorHoglander, E.
dc.contributor.authorLosa, F.
dc.contributor.authorMoch, H.
dc.contributor.authorPauli, C.
dc.contributor.authorRoss, J. S.
dc.contributor.authorSokol, E. S.
dc.contributor.authorTothill, R. W.
dc.contributor.authorWestphalen, C. B.
dc.contributor.authorKramer, A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-11T11:59:40Z
dc.date.available2022-01-11T11:59:40Z
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.identifier.citationMileshkin L, Karapetyan AR, Beringer A, Bochtler T, Chalabi N, Cook N, et al. Baseline mutational profiles of patients with carcinoma-of-unknown-primary-origin (CUP) enrolled onto CUPISCO. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2021;17:129-30.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/624844
dc.description.abstractAims: NCCN guidelines consider next-generation sequencing important in therapeutic decision-making in CUP. CUPISCO (NCT03498521) is an ongoing, phase II, randomized study of targeted therapy/cancer immunotherapy vs platinum-based chemotherapy in ESMO-guideline-defined unfavourable CUP. We present a preliminary, descriptive molecular analysis of ∼50% of patients designated for enrollment. Methods: Upon enrollment, comprehensive genomic profiling, including determination of microsatellite instability and tumour mutational burden (TMB), was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded issues using the F1CDx assay. Gene alterations (GAs) found in ≥3% of patients were analyzed using multiple correspondence analyses and hierarchical clustering to identify co-occurrences. Results: Median age was 61.5 years (n = 346 [Apr 2021]; range: 22– 84); median TMB, 2.5 mutations/Mb (0–63.0). In our analysis, 30% of patients carried a potentially targetable GA. Most-frequent GAs were TP53 (44%), CDKN2A (32%), KRAS (21%; 2% G12C alterations), CDKN2B (21%), ARID1A (13%), STK11 (13%), MTAP (12%), PIK3CA (10%), MYC (8%), PBRM1 (8%), BAP1 (8%), and FGFR2 (8%). Beyond PIK3CA and FGFR2, other targetable GAs were identified in EGFR (2%), ERBB2 (6%), ALK (0.3%), ROS1 (1%), MET (2%), NTRK1 (1%), and BRAF (6%). The frequency of microsatellite instability- and TMB-high (> 16 mutations/Mb) samples was 3% and 9%, respectively. Based on hierarchical clustering of co-mutational profiles, multiple clusters were identified in the study cohort, each characterized by specific GA cooccurrences. Conclusions: This descriptive analysis sheds further light on the molecular landscape in patients with poor-prognosis CUP. Our analyses demonstrate that CUP cases can be clustered based on molecular profiling; further studies are needed to determine if these clusters carry clinical relevance. Our early results suggest that comprehensive genomic profiling of CUP samples identifies therapeutically relevant GAs in a significant proportion of patients and could thus guide personalized treatment of these tumors.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleBaseline mutational profiles of patients with carcinoma-of-unknown-primary-origin (CUP) enrolled onto CUPISCOen
dc.typeMeetings and Proceedingsen
dc.contributor.departmentMedical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC,Australiaen
dc.identifier.journalAsia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncologyen
dc.description.noteen]


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record