• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Assessing quality of life with ePROMs in patients with cutaneous lymphoma

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Crooks, G. J.
    Parry, E.
    Farquharson, N.
    Pham, M.
    Maddocks, N.
    Cowan, R.
    Affiliation
    Manchester Medical School-The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Issue Date
    2021
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Cutaneous lymphoma significantly impacts an individual’s quality of life (QoL). Electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) can be used to assess the impact of cutaneous lymphoma on a patient’s QoL by a series of questions exploring symptoms, emotions and functional ability. This service evaluation aimed to establish the feasibility of ePROMs at assessing QoL and patient opinions on this method. Data was analysed to establish what percentage of patients receiving the invitation to fill in the ePROMs questionnaire were actually completing it, and for those who weren’t we investigated possible reasons for this. Responses were also analysed to investigate whether a variety of parameters (stage of disease, gender, age, current treatment) affected the responses to the questionnaire. Additionally, between the 28th and the 26th of May, 19 patients and 3 clinicians were interviewed in order to gather their thoughts regarding ePROMs. 76% of patients completed the questionnaire. Analysis of responses by age and gender did not reveal any considerable trends. However, those with advanced stage disease demonstrated a trend towards higher scores on the questionnaire when compared with those with early-stage disease. Furthermore, those undergoing active treatment did have higher scores across all domains compared with those who were under surveillance and/or receiving topical therapies. On the whole opinions regarding ePROMs were positive. Several patients commented on the ease of completion and relevance of the questionnaire to their condition. Common obstacles were the lack of a smartphone or internet access. Clinician’s opinions were on the whole positive. They commented that patient responses to the questionnaire prompted discussions around the psychological impact of their disease within consultations. However, it was noted by all 3 clinicians that their work was slowed down by the use of this questionnaire. This service evaluation shows that the use of ePROMs questionnaire is feasible and does have an adequate level of acceptance by both patients and clinicians. In the future, this service could be utilised to monitor disease progression and assess treatment outcomes in these patients.
    Citation
    Crooks GJ, Parry E, Farquharson N, Pham M, Maddocks N, Cowan R. Assessing quality of life with ePROMs in patients with cutaneous lymphoma. European Journal of Cancer. 2021;156:S66-S7.
    Journal
    European Journal of Cancer
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/624841
    Type
    Meetings and Proceedings
    Language
    en
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.