Hospital volume and outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a national population-based study using patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function
Cowling, T. E.
Parry, M. G.
van der Meulen, J.
Clarke, Noel W
AffiliationDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBackground: Improvements in short-term outcomes have been reported for hospitals with higher radical prostatectomy (RP) volumes. However, the association with longer-term functional outcomes is unknown. Methods: All patients diagnosed with non-metastatic prostate cancer in the English NHS between 2014 and 2016 who underwent RP (N = 10,089) were mailed a survey ≥18 months after diagnosis. Differences in patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function (EPIC-26 on scale from 0 to 100) by hospital volume group (≤60, 61-100, 101-140, >140 RPs/year) were estimated using multilevel linear regression. Results: Overall, 7702 men (76.3%) responded. There were no statistically significant differences in urinary continence (p = 0.08) or sexual function scores with increasing volume group (p = 0.2). When modelled as a linear function, we found a non-significant increase of 0.70 (95% CI -0.41 to 1.80; p = 0.22) in urinary continence and a significant increase of 1.54 (0.62-2.45; p = 0.001) in sexual function scores for a 100-procedure increase in hospital volume, which did not meet the threshold for a minimal clinically important difference (10-12 points). The results were similar for robotic-assisted RP (5529 men [71.8%]). Conclusions: These results do not support further centralisation of RP services beyond levels in England where four in five hospitals perform >60 RPs/year.
CitationNossiter J, Morris M, Cowling TE, Parry MG, Sujenthiran A, Aggarwal A, et al. Hospital volume and outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a national population-based study using patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Sep 8.
JournalProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
- Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy: functional outcomes 18 months after diagnosis from a national cohort study in England.
- Authors: Nossiter J, Sujenthiran A, Charman SC, Cathcart PJ, Aggarwal A, Payne H, Clarke NW, van der Meulen J
- Issue date: 2018 Feb 20
- Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.
- Authors: Egan J, Marhamati S, Carvalho FLF, Davis M, O'Neill J, Lee H, Lynch JH, Hankins RA, Hu JC, Kowalczyk KJ
- Issue date: 2021 Jun
- The impact of anterior urethropexy during robotic prostatectomy on urinary and sexual outcomes.
- Authors: Johnson EK, Hedgepeth RC, He C, Wood DP Jr
- Issue date: 2011 Apr
- Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer.
- Authors: Vernooij RW, Lancee M, Cleves A, Dahm P, Bangma CH, Aben KK
- Issue date: 2020 Jun 4
- Urinary function after radical prostatectomy: a comparison of the retropubic and perineal approaches.
- Authors: Gray M, Petroni GR, Theodorescu D
- Issue date: 1999 May