Evaluating the potential utility of three-dimensional printed models in preoperative planning and patient consent in gastrointestinal cancer surgery
AffiliationCountess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, UK
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractIntroduction: The Future of Surgery report from the Royal College of Surgeons of England acknowledges the important role that three-dimensional imaging will play in support of personalised surgical interventions. One component of this is preoperative planning. We investigated surgeons' and patients' perceptions of this evolving technology. Materials and methods: Ethical approval was obtained. From a normal computed tomography scan, three-dimensional models of the stomach, pancreas and rectum were rendered and printed on an Ultimaker™ three-dimensional printer. Semi-structured interviews were performed with surgeons and patients to explore perceived model effectiveness and utility. Likert scales were used to grade responses (1 = strongly disagree; 10 = strongly agree) and qualitative responses recorded. Results: A total of 26 surgeons (9 rectal, 9 oesophagogastric, 8 pancreatic) and 30 patients (median age 62 years, interquartile range, IQR, 68-72 years; 57% male) were recruited. Median surgeon scores were effectiveness for preoperative planning, 6 (IQR 3-7), authenticity, 5 (IQR 3-6), likability, 6 (IQR 4-7), promoting learning, 7 (IQR 5-8), utility, 6 (IQR 5-7) and helping patients, 7 (IQR 5-8). Median patient scores were usefulness to the surgeon, 8 (IQR 7-9), authenticity, 8 (IQR 6-8), likability, 8 (IQR 7-8), helping understanding of condition, 8 (IQR 8-9), helping understanding of surgery, 8 (IQR 7-9) and feeling uncomfortable, 1 (IQR 1-4). Median overall decisional conflict score (0 = no; 100 = high) was 22 (IQR 19-28) and decision effectiveness was 25 (IQR 19-30). Discussion: Overall, patients and surgeons considered that three-dimensional printed models were effective and had potential utility in education and, to a lesser extent, preoperative planning. Patient decisional conflict and effectiveness scores were weighted towards certainty in decision making but had room for improvement, which three-dimensional models may help to facilitate.
CitationPovey M, Powell S, Howes N, Vimalachandran D, Sutton P. Evaluating the potential utility of three-dimensional printed models in preoperative planning and patient consent in gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021;103(8):615-20.
JournalAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
- Virtual Surgery for the Nasal Airway: A Preliminary Report on Decision Support and Technology Acceptance.
- Authors: Vanhille DL, Garcia GJM, Asan O, Borojeni AAT, Frank-Ito DO, Kimbell JS, Pawar SS, Rhee JS
- Issue date: 2018 Jan 1
- Comparison of 3-Dimensional and Augmented Reality Kidney Models With Conventional Imaging Data in the Preoperative Assessment of Children With Wilms Tumors.
- Authors: Wellens LM, Meulstee J, van de Ven CP, Terwisscha van Scheltinga CEJ, Littooij AS, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Fiocco M, Rios AC, Maal T, Wijnen MHWA
- Issue date: 2019 Apr 5
- The myth of informed consent in rectal cancer surgery: what do patients retain?
- Authors: Scheer AS, O'Connor AM, Chan BP, Moloo H, Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Auer RC, Boushey RP
- Issue date: 2012 Sep
- Measurement of the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Medical Models to Be Used for Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy.
- Authors: Michiels C, Jambon E, Bernhard JC
- Issue date: 2019 Sep
- Development and validation of 3D printed virtual models for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy: urologists' and patients' perception.
- Authors: Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Autorino R, Dasgupta P, Wiklund P, Tewari A, Liatsikos E, Fiori C, ESUT Research Group.
- Issue date: 2018 Feb