• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    The use and effectiveness of an online diagnostic support system for blood film interpretation: comparative observational study

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    34383663.pdf
    Size:
    1.472Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    From UNPAYWALL
    Download
    Authors
    Hutchinson, C.
    Brereton, M.
    Adams, J.
    De La Salle, B.
    Sims, J.
    Hyde, K.
    Chasty, Richard
    Brown, R.
    Rees-Unwin, K
    Burthem, J.
    Affiliation
    Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
    Issue Date
    2021
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: The recognition and interpretation of abnormal blood cell morphology is often the first step in diagnosing underlying serious systemic illness or leukemia. Supporting the staff who interpret blood film morphology is therefore essential for a safe laboratory service. This paper describes an open-access, web-based decision support tool, developed by the authors to support morphological diagnosis, arising from earlier studies identifying mechanisms of error in blood film reporting. The effectiveness of this intervention was assessed using the unique resource offered by the online digital morphology Continuing Professional Development scheme (DM scheme) offered by the UK National External Quality Assessment Service for Haematology, with more than 3000 registered users. This allowed the effectiveness of decision support to be tested within a defined user group, each of whom viewed and interpreted the morphology of identical digital blood films. Objective: The primary objective of the study was to test the effectiveness of the decision support system in supporting users to identify and interpret abnormal morphological features. The secondary objective was to determine the pattern and frequency of use of the system for different case types, and to determine how users perceived the support in terms of their confidence in decision-making. Methods: This was a comparative study of identical blood films evaluated either with or without decision support. Selected earlier cases from the DM scheme were rereleased as new cases but with decision support made available; this allowed a comparison of data sets for identical cases with or without decision support. To address the primary objectives, the study used quantitative evaluation and statistical comparisons of the identification and interpretation of morphological features between the two different case releases. To address the secondary objective, the use of decision support was assessed using web analytical tools, while a questionnaire was used to assess user perceptions of the system. Results: Cases evaluated with the aid of decision support had significantly improved accuracy of identification for relevant morphological features (mean improvement 9.8%) and the interpretation of those features (mean improvement 11%). The improvement was particularly significant for cases with higher complexity or for rarer diagnoses. Analysis of website usage demonstrated a high frequency of access for web pages relevant to each case (mean 9298 for each case, range 2661-24,276). Users reported that the decision support website increased their confidence for feature identification (4.8/5) and interpretation (4.3/5), both within the context of training (4.6/5) and also in their wider laboratory practice (4.4/5). Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrate that directed online decision support for blood morphology evaluation improves accuracy and confidence in the context of educational evaluation of digital films, with effectiveness potentially extending to wider laboratory use.
    Citation
    Hutchinson C, Brereton M, Adams J, De La Salle B, Sims J, Hyde K, et al. The Use and Effectiveness of an Online Diagnostic Support System for Blood Film Interpretation: Comparative Observational Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 9;23(8):e20815.
    Journal
    Journal of Medical Internet Research
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/624523
    DOI
    10.2196/20815
    PubMed ID
    34383663
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20815
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.2196/20815
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Do We Know Why We Make Errors in Morphological Diagnosis? An Analysis of Approach and Decision-Making in Haematological Morphology.
    • Authors: Brereton M, De La Salle B, Ardern J, Hyde K, Burthem J
    • Issue date: 2015 Sep
    • The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    • Authors: Allen D, Gillen E, Rixson L
    • Issue date: 2009
    • The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    • Authors: Sinclair P, Kable A, Levett-Jones T
    • Issue date: 2015 Jan
    • A web-based, peer-supported self-management intervention to reduce distress in relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: the REACT RCT.
    • Authors: Lobban F, Akers N, Appelbe D, Iraci Capuccinello R, Chapman L, Collinge L, Dodd S, Flowers S, Hollingsworth B, Honary M, Johnson S, Jones SH, Mateus C, Mezes B, Murray E, Panagaki K, Rainford N, Robinson H, Rosala-Hallas A, Sellwood W, Walker A, Williamson PR
    • Issue date: 2020 Jun
    • The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    • Authors: Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W
    • Issue date: 2020 Nov
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.