Experimental assessment of inter-centre variation in stopping-power and range prediction in particle therapy
Dahlgren, C. V.
de Marzi, L.
Jensen, M. F.
Mackay, Ranald I
van der Tol, P.
AffiliationOncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractPurpose: Experimental assessment of inter-centre variation and absolute accuracy of stopping-power-ratio (SPR) prediction within 17 particle therapy centres of the European Particle Therapy Network. Material and methods: A head and body phantom with seventeen tissue-equivalent materials were scanned consecutively at the participating centres using their individual clinical CT scan protocol and translated into SPR with their in-house CT-number-to-SPR conversion. Inter-centre variation and absolute accuracy in SPR prediction were quantified for three tissue groups: lung, soft tissues and bones. The integral effect on range prediction for typical clinical beams traversing different tissues was determined for representative beam paths for the treatment of primary brain tumours as well as lung and prostate cancer. Results: An inter-centre variation in SPR prediction (2σ) of 8.7%, 6.3% and 1.5% relative to water was determined for bone, lung and soft-tissue surrogates in the head setup, respectively. Slightly smaller variations were observed in the body phantom (6.2%, 3.1%, 1.3%). This translated into inter-centre variation of integral range prediction (2σ) of 2.9%, 2.6% and 1.3% for typical beam paths of prostate-, lung- and primary brain-tumour treatments, respectively. The absolute error in range exceeded 2% in every fourth participating centre. The consideration of beam hardening and the execution of an independent HLUT validation had a positive effect, on average. Conclusion: The large inter-centre variations in SPR and range prediction justify the currently clinically used margins accounting for range uncertainty, which are of the same magnitude as the inter-centre variation. This study underlines the necessity of higher standardisation in CT-number-to-SPR conversion.
CitationPeters N, Wohlfahrt P, Dahlgren CV, de Marzi L, Ellerbrock M, Fracchiolla F, et al. Experimental assessment of inter-centre variation in stopping-power and range prediction in particle therapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2021 Oct;163:7–13.
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
- Inter-centre variability of CT-based stopping-power prediction in particle therapy: Survey-based evaluation.
- Authors: Taasti VT, Bäumer C, Dahlgren CV, Deisher AJ, Ellerbrock M, Free J, Gora J, Kozera A, Lomax AJ, De Marzi L, Molinelli S, Kevin Teo BK, Wohlfahrt P, Petersen JBB, Muren LP, Hansen DC, Richter C
- Issue date: 2018 Apr
- Dual-Energy Computed Tomography to Assess Intra- and Inter-Patient Tissue Variability for Proton Treatment Planning of Patients With Brain Tumor.
- Authors: Wohlfahrt P, Möhler C, Troost EGC, Greilich S, Richter C
- Issue date: 2019 Nov 1
- First-In-Human Validation of CT-Based Proton Range Prediction Using Prompt Gamma Imaging in Prostate Cancer Treatments.
- Authors: Berthold J, Khamfongkhruea C, Petzoldt J, Thiele J, Hölscher T, Wohlfahrt P, Peters N, Jost A, Hofmann C, Janssens G, Smeets J, Richter C
- Issue date: 2021 Jul 3
- Refinement of the Hounsfield look-up table by retrospective application of patient-specific direct proton stopping-power prediction from dual-energy CT.
- Authors: Wohlfahrt P, Möhler C, Enghardt W, Krause M, Kunath D, Menkel S, Troost EGC, Greilich S, Richter C
- Issue date: 2020 Apr
- Dual-energy CT based proton range prediction in head and pelvic tumor patients.
- Authors: Wohlfahrt P, Möhler C, Stützer K, Greilich S, Richter C
- Issue date: 2017 Dec