Is the morphological subtype of extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma clinically relevant?
Taboada, R G
Claro, L C
Riechelmann, R S
Hubner, Richard A
Valle, Juan W
McNamara, Mairead G
AffiliationDivision of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractExtra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP-NECs) are lethal cancers with limited treatment options. Identification of contributing factors to the observed heterogeneity of clinical outcomes within the EP-NEC family is warranted, to enable identification of effective treatments. A multicentre retrospective study investigated potential differences in "real-world" treatment/survival outcomes between small-cell (SC) versus (vs.) non-SC EP-NECs. One-hundred and seventy patients were included: 77 (45.3%) had SC EP-NECs and 93 (54.7%) had non-SC EP-NECs. Compared to the SC subgroup, the non-SC subgroup had the following features: (1) a lower mean Ki-67 index (69.3% vs. 78.7%; p = 0.002); (2) a lower proportion of cases with a Ki-67 index of ≥55% (73.9% vs. 88.7%; p = 0.025); (3) reduced sensitivity to first-line platinum/etoposide (objective response rate: 31.6% vs. 55.1%, p = 0.015; and disease control rate; 59.7% vs. 79.6%, p = 0.027); (4) worse progression-free survival (PFS) (adjusted-HR = 1.615, p = 0.016) and overall survival (OS) (adjusted-HR = 1.640, p = 0.015) in the advanced setting. Within the advanced EP-NEC cohort, subgroups according to morphological subtype and Ki-67 index (<55% vs. ≥55%) had significantly different PFS (adjusted-p = 0.021) and OS (adjusted-p = 0.051), with the non-SC subgroup with a Ki-67 index of <55% and non-SC subgroup with a Ki-67 index of ≥55% showing the best and worst outcomes, respectively. To conclude, the morphological subtype of EP-NEC provides complementary information to the Ki-67 index and may aid identification of patients who could benefit from alternative first-line treatment strategies to platinum/etoposide.
CitationFrizziero M, Durand A, Taboada RG, Zaninotto E, Luchini C, Chakrabarty B, et al. Is the Morphological Subtype of Extra-Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Clinically Relevant? Cancers. 2021 Aug 18;13(16):4152.
- Carboplatin in Combination with Oral or Intravenous Etoposide for Extra-Pulmonary, Poorly-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas.
- Authors: Frizziero M, Spada F, Lamarca A, Kordatou Z, Barriuso J, Nuttall C, McNamara MG, Hubner RA, Mansoor W, Manoharan P, Fazio N, Valle JW
- Issue date: 2019
- The impact of pathologic differentiation (well/poorly) and the degree of Ki-67 index in patients with metastatic WHO grade 3 GEP-NECs.
- Authors: Kim HK, Ha SY, Lee J, Park SH, Park JO, Lim HY, Kang WK, Park YS, Kim ST
- Issue date: 2017 Sep 26
- Second-line treatment in patients with advanced extra-pulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Authors: McNamara MG, Frizziero M, Jacobs T, Lamarca A, Hubner RA, Valle JW, Amir E
- Issue date: 2020
- The impact of primary tumor site on outcomes of treatment with etoposide and cisplatin in grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma.
- Authors: Yoon SE, Kim JH, Lee SJ, Lee J, Park SH, Park JO, Lim HY, Kang WK, Park YS, Kim ST
- Issue date: 2019
- Characteristics and treatment of patients with G3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.
- Authors: Heetfeld M, Chougnet CN, Olsen IH, Rinke A, Borbath I, Crespo G, Barriuso J, Pavel M, O'Toole D, Walter T, other Knowledge Network members.
- Issue date: 2015 Aug