Could ovarian cancer prediction models improve the triage of symptomatic women in primary care? a modelling study using routinely collected data.
AffiliationThe Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.ondon E1 2AB, UK.
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractCA125 is widely used as an initial investigation in women presenting with symptoms of possible ovarian cancer. We sought to develop CA125-based diagnostic prediction models and to explore potential implications of implementing model-based thresholds for further investigation in primary care. This retrospective cohort study used routinely collected primary care and cancer registry data from symptomatic, CA125-tested women in England (2011-2014). A total of 29,962 women were included, of whom 279 were diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Logistic regression was used to develop two models to estimate ovarian cancer probability: Model 1 consisted of age and CA125 level; Model 2 incorporated further risk factors. Model discrimination (AUC) was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. The sensitivity and specificity of various model risk thresholds (≥1% to ≥3%) were compared with that of the current CA125 cut-off (≥35 U/mL). Model 1 exhibited excellent discrimination (AUC: 0.94) on cross-validation. The inclusion of additional variables (Model 2) did not improve performance. At a risk threshold of ≥1%, Model 1 exhibited greater sensitivity (86.4% vs. 78.5%) but lower specificity (89.1% vs. 94.5%) than CA125 (≥35 U/mL). Applying the ≥1% model threshold to the cohort in place of the current CA125 cut-off, 1 in every 74 additional women identified had ovarian cancer. Following external validation, Model 1 could be used as part of a 'risk-based triage' system in which women at high risk of undiagnosed ovarian cancer are selected for urgent specialist investigation, while women at 'low risk but not no risk' are offered non-urgent investigation or interval CA125 re-testing. Such an approach has the potential to expedite ovarian cancer diagnosis, but further research is needed to evaluate the clinical impact and health-economic implications.
CitationFunston G, Abel G, Crosbie EJ, Hamilton W, Walter FM. Could Ovarian Cancer Prediction Models Improve the Triage of Symptomatic Women in Primary Care? A Modelling Study Using Routinely Collected Data. Cancers. 2021 Jun 9;13(12):2886.
- The diagnostic performance of CA125 for the detection of ovarian and non-ovarian cancer in primary care: A population-based cohort study.
- Authors: Funston G, Hamilton W, Abel G, Crosbie EJ, Rous B, Walter FM
- Issue date: 2020 Oct
- CA125 test result, test-to-diagnosis interval, and stage in ovarian cancer at diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records.
- Authors: Funston G, Mounce LT, Price S, Rous B, Crosbie EJ, Hamilton W, Walter FM
- Issue date: 2021 Jun
- Development and validation of circulating CA125 prediction models in postmenopausal women.
- Authors: Sasamoto N, Babic A, Rosner BA, Fortner RT, Vitonis AF, Yamamoto H, Fichorova RN, Titus LJ, Tjønneland A, Hansen L, Kvaskoff M, Fournier A, Mancini FR, Boeing H, Trichopoulou A, Peppa E, Karakatsani A, Palli D, Grioni S, Mattiello A, Tumino R, Fiano V, Onland-Moret NC, Weiderpass E, Gram IT, Quirós JR, Lujan-Barroso L, Sánchez MJ, Colorado-Yohar S, Barricarte A, Amiano P, Idahl A, Lundin E, Sartor H, Khaw KT, Key TJ, Muller D, Riboli E, Gunter M, Dossus L, Trabert B, Wentzensen N, Kaaks R, Cramer DW, Tworoger SS, Terry KL
- Issue date: 2019 Nov 26
- Differential blood count as triage tool in evaluation of pelvic masses.
- Authors: Cramer DW, Benjamin Iv WJ, Vitonis AF, Berkowitz R, Goodman A, Matulonis U
- Issue date: 2021 May
- Proofs for implementation of higher HE4 and ROMA index cut-off values in ovarian cancer preoperative stratification.
- Authors: Špacir Prskalo Z, Bulić P, Langer S, Gaće M, Puljiz M, Danolić D, Alvir I, Mamić I, Šušnjar L, Mayer L
- Issue date: 2019 Feb