Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBetz-Stablein, B.
dc.contributor.authorD'Alessandro, B.
dc.contributor.authorKoh, U.
dc.contributor.authorPlasmeijer, E.
dc.contributor.authorJanda, M.
dc.contributor.authorMenzies, S. W.
dc.contributor.authorHofmann-Wellenhof, R.
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Adèle C
dc.contributor.authorSoyer, H. P.
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-17T12:22:52Z
dc.date.available2021-08-17T12:22:52Z
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.identifier.citationBetz-Stablein B, D’Alessandro B, Koh U, Plasmeijer E, Janda M, Menzies SW, et al. Reproducible Naevus Counts Using 3D Total Body Photography and Convolutional Neural Networks. Dermatology. 2021 Jul 8;1–8.en
dc.identifier.pmid34237739en
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000517218en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/624485
dc.description.abstractBackground: The number of naevi on a person is the strongest risk factor for melanoma; however, naevus counting is highly variable due to lack of consistent methodology and lack of inter-rater agreement. Machine learning has been shown to be a valuable tool for image classification in dermatology. Objectives: To test whether automated, reproducible naevus counts are possible through the combination of convolutional neural networks (CNN) and three-dimensional (3D) total body imaging. Methods: Total body images from a study of naevi in the general population were used for the training (82 subjects, 57,742 lesions) and testing (10 subjects; 4,868 lesions) datasets for the development of a CNN. Lesions were labelled as naevi, or not ("non-naevi"), by a senior dermatologist as the gold standard. Performance of the CNN was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's kappa, and evaluated at the lesion level and person level. Results: Lesion-level analysis comparing the automated counts to the gold standard showed a sensitivity and specificity of 79% (76-83%) and 91% (90-92%), respectively, for lesions ≥2 mm, and 84% (75-91%) and 91% (88-94%) for lesions ≥5 mm. Cohen's kappa was 0.56 (0.53-0.59) indicating moderate agreement for naevi ≥2 mm, and substantial agreement (0.72, 0.63-0.80) for naevi ≥5 mm. For the 10 individuals in the test set, person-level agreement was assessed as categories with 70% agreement between the automated and gold standard counts. Agreement was lower in subjects with numerous seborrhoeic keratoses. Conclusion: Automated naevus counts with reasonable agreement to those of an expert clinician are possible through the combination of 3D total body photography and CNNs. Such an algorithm may provide a faster, reproducible method over the traditional in person total body naevus counts.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000517218en
dc.titleReproducible naevus counts using 3D total body photography and convolutional neural networksen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Cancer and Population Studies, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.en
dc.identifier.journalDermatologyen
dc.description.noteen]
refterms.dateFOA2021-08-18T10:56:44Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
34237739.pdf
Size:
564.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
From UNPAYWALL

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record