Recalibration of thinking about adrenocortical function assessment: how the 'random' cortisol relates to the short synacthen test results
Authors
Michaelidou, M.Yadegarfar, G.
Morris, L.
Dolan, S.
Robinson, A.
Naseem, A.
Livingston, M.
Duff, C. J.
Trainer, Peter J
Fryer, A. A
Heald, A. H.
Affiliation
Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford.Issue Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: The short synacthen test (SST) is the most commonly performed investigation to assess adrenal function. Appropriate criteria for when an SST is performed are subject to debate. We investigated how random serum cortisol levels relate to SST response. Methods: We examined random cortisol measurements taken between 04.40-23.55 p.m. results of SST baseline and 30-/60-min cortisol performed over 12 months (225 SSTs) at Salford Royal Hospital. Serum cortisol was measured on the Siemens Centaur Analyser.A 30-60-min cortisol concentration of ≥450 nmol/L defined a pass; 350-449 nmol/L defined borderline. Results: Patients only proceeded to SST if random cortisol was <400 nmol/L. For those not on corticosteroids for at least 2 weeks, 42/43 (97.7%) cases with random cortisol concentration of ≥200 nmol/L had an SST 'pass'. The relation was less clear with corticosteroid treatment (19/35 cases; 54%).For those not taking glucocorticoid treatment (including inhaled/topical corticosteroids) in the previous 2 weeks, 91.8% of SSTs were pass/2.7% borderline/5.5% fail. For those on steroids, 51.9% of SSTs were a pass/11.4% were borderline.In relation to the postsynacthen cortisol pass cut-off of ≥450 nmol/L, in 15/207 (7.2%) of cases, the 60-min cortisol was ≥450 nmol/L (adequate adrenocortical function), but 30-min cortisol was below this. In all cases where the 30-min cortisol did indicate a pass (i.e. was ≥450 nmol/L) the 60-min cortisol was also ≥450 nmol/L. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that if the random cortisol level is ≥200 nmol/L, regardless of the time of day and the person was not taking corticosteroid treatment in the previous 2 weeks, SST may not be needed. Our data also suggests that 60-min cortisol retains utility.Citation
Michaelidou M, Yadegarfar G, Morris L, Dolan S, Robinson A, Naseem A, et al. Recalibration of thinking about adrenocortical function assessment: how the ‘random’ cortisol relates to the short synacthen test results. Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism . 2021 Apr 12;10(2):137–45.Journal
Cardiovascular Endocrinology and MetabolismDOI
10.1097/xce.0000000000000250PubMed ID
34113799Additional Links
https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/xce.0000000000000250Type
ArticleLanguage
enae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1097/xce.0000000000000250
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Can a random serum cortisol reduce the need for short synacthen tests in acute medical admissions?
- Authors: Kadiyala R, Kamath C, Baglioni P, Geen J, Okosieme OE
- Issue date: 2010 Jul
- Comparison of the low dose short synacthen test (1 microg), the conventional dose short synacthen test (250 microg), and the insulin tolerance test for assessment of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in patients with pituitary disease.
- Authors: Abdu TA, Elhadd TA, Neary R, Clayton RN
- Issue date: 1999 Mar
- How reliable is the short synacthen test for the investigation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis?
- Authors: Bangar V, Clayton RN
- Issue date: 1998 Dec
- How good is a morning cortisol in predicting an adequate response to intramuscular synacthen stimulation?
- Authors: Yo WS, Toh LM, Brown SJ, Howe WD, Henley DE, Lim EM
- Issue date: 2014 Jul
- Outcomes of the short Synacthen test: what is the role of the 60 min sample in clinical practice?
- Authors: Dineen R, Mohamed A, Gunness A, Rakovac A, Cullen E, Barnwell N, Neary C, Behan LA, Boran G, Gibney J, Sherlock M
- Issue date: 2020 Feb