• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Variations in IMRT demand and delivery across England

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Mee, Thomas
    Kirkby, Norman
    Burnet, Neil G
    Mackay, Ranald I
    Gray, R.
    Shelton, J
    Kirkby, Karen J
    Affiliation
    University Of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester,
    Issue Date
    2020
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Purpose or Objective Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) is a key radiotherapy (RT) technique used for radical treatments. A 2015 report1 from England suggested that 51.8% of radical RT patients should be treated with IMRT. However, there are variations in the profile of cancer throughout England. This will result in variations in the demand for IMRT and therefore 51.8% may not be applicable at local level. Delivery of IMRT may also vary between RT centres. The English Cancer registries record delivered RT data, including which treatments were IMRT. Here, we compare the recorded IMRT delivered data to a local-level IMRT demand simulations. Material and Methods The future IMRT predictions from the 2015 report were encoded into the Malthus Model2 for every IMRT relevant cancer site. Malthus contains local-level population, incidence and stage presentation data. Malthus simulated the IMRT demand for every clinical commissioning group (CCG) in England. The recorded IMRT delivered data is also at CCG level and was sourced from Public Health England. The recorded IMRT data was converted to a percentage of the simulated demand. A heat map of the results was created for England in Tableau software3. The postcode location of every main RT centre in England was obtained and plotted on the heat map, including information on the number of linacs registered at the centre. Breast IMRT was excluded from the analysis, as it could potentially distort the data, due to current questions around inverse/forward planned IMRT and service targets1. Results There is variation in simulated demand for IMRT across England, ranging from 44.7% to 56.5% of radical RT patients. There is also variation in recorded IMRT delivery, ranging from 21% to 67%. When comparing a CCG’s recorded IMRT to its simulated demand the results range from 55% to 164%. Figure 1 shows the results of the comparison for every CCG in England alongside RT centre location and size information. Conclusion The combination of the future demand figures from the 2015 IMRT report and the Malthus model has produced the regional variations in IMRT demand. The heat map of the comparison of recorded IMRT delivery data to the locallevel demand, highlights regions within England which may be under providing, or over providing, IMRT. These areas should be investigated in detail to identify the reasons for these differences. There may be non-service factors driving the differences, such as data and recording inaccuracies, incidence fluctuations or comorbidities. These are factors which are not currently included in the Malthus model.
    Citation
    Mee T, Kirkby NF, Burnet NG, Mackay RI, Gray R, Shelton J, et al. PO-1274: Variations in IMRT demand and delivery across England. Radiotherapy and Oncology . 2020 Nov;152:S671–2.
    Journal
    Radiotherapy and Oncology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/624164
    Type
    Meetings and Proceedings
    Language
    en
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.