• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Defining standards in colorectal optimisation: a Delphi study protocol to achieve international consensus on key standards for colorectal surgery prehabilitation

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    33762250.pdf
    Size:
    412.2Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    From UNPAYWALL
    Download
    Authors
    Pearson, I.
    Blackwell, S.
    Fish, Rebecca
    Daniels, S.
    West, M.
    Mutrie, N.
    Kelly, P.
    Knight, S.
    Fearnhead, N. S.
    Moug, S.
    Affiliation
    The University of Edinburgh, Undergraduate Medical School, Edinburgh
    Issue Date
    2021
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Introduction: Prehabilitation in colorectal surgery is evolving and may minimise postoperative morbidity and mortality. With many different healthcare professionals contributing to the prehabilitation literature, there is significant variation in reported primary endpoints that restricts comparison. In addition, there has been limited work on patient-related outcome measures suggesting that patients with colorectal cancer needs and issues are being overlooked. The Defining Standards in Colorectal Optimisation Study aims to achieve international consensus from all stakeholders on key standards to provide a framework for reporting future prehabilitation research. Methods and analysis: A systematic review will identify key standards reported in trials of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery. Standards that are important to patients will be identified by a patient and public involvement (PPI) event. The longlist of standards generated from the systematic review and PPI event will be used to develop a three-round online Delphi process. This will engage all stakeholders (healthcare professionals and patients) both nationally and internationally. The results of the Delphi will be followed by a face-to-face interactive consensus meeting that will define the final standards for prehabilitation for elective colorectal surgery. Ethics and dissemination: The University of Glasgow College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences Ethics Committee has approved this protocol, which is registered as a study (200190120) with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative. Publication of the standards developed by all stakeholders will increase the potential for comparative research that advances understanding of the clinical application of prehabilitation.
    Citation
    Pearson I, Blackwell S, Fish R, Daniels S, West M, Mutrie N, et al. Defining standards in colorectal optimisation: a Delphi study protocol to achieve international consensus on key standards for colorectal surgery prehabilitation. BMJ Open. 2021;11(3):e047235.
    Journal
    BMJ Open
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/623950
    DOI
    10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047235
    PubMed ID
    33762250
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047235
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047235
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Core outcome research measures in anal cancer (CORMAC): protocol for systematic review, qualitative interviews and Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in anal cancer.
    • Authors: Fish R, Sanders C, Williamson PR, Renehan AG
    • Issue date: 2017 Nov 22
    • Cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation prior to elective surgery compared to usual preoperative care: protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluations.
    • Authors: Rombey T, Eckhardt H, Quentin W
    • Issue date: 2020 Dec 31
    • Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for cauda equina syndrome: systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, Delphi survey and consensus meeting.
    • Authors: Srikandarajah N, Noble AJ, Wilby M, Clark S, Williamson PR, Marson AG
    • Issue date: 2019 May 1
    • Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for stillbirth care research (iCHOOSE Study).
    • Authors: Bakhbakhi D, Fraser A, Siasakos D, Hinton L, Davies A, Merriel A, Duffy JMN, Redshaw M, Lynch M, Timlin L, Flenady V, Heazell AE, Downe S, Slade P, Brookes S, Wojcieszek A, Murphy M, de Oliveira Salgado H, Pollock D, Aggarwal N, Attachie I, Leisher S, Kihusa W, Mulley K, Wimmer L, UK iCHOOSE parent involvement group, Burden C
    • Issue date: 2022 Feb 9
    • Core outcome set measurement for future clinical trials in acute myeloid leukemia: the HARMONY study protocol using a multi-stakeholder consensus-based Delphi process and a final consensus meeting.
    • Authors: Lang KM, Harrison KL, Williamson PR, Huntly BJP, Ossenkoppele G, Geissler J, Bereczky T, Hernández-Rivas JM, Chevrou-Séverac H, Goodbody R, Schulze-Rath R, Bullinger L
    • Issue date: 2020 May 27
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.