Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) monitoring in primary care after discharge from hospital-based follow-up following prostate cancer treatment
Affiliation
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester,Issue Date
2020
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objective: To examine follow-up procedures after men are discharged into primary care following prostate cancer and highlight any areas for service improvement. Methods: Patient record data from two Greater Manchester boroughs were retrieved retrospectively to investigate discharge instructions and monitoring adherence. Questionnaires were sent to patients exploring their understanding of the follow-up process. Results: A total of 300 records were accessed. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) re-referral level was provided to GPs in 39% of cases. Forty- six percent of men were not tested frequently enough, and 6% had no PSA testing recorded post-discharge. A total of 222 patient questionnaires were returned. Sixty-seven percent felt GPs should be responsible for PSA monitoring, and 60% felt confident that their GP was doing so effectively. Conversely, 12% felt their PSA monitoring had been neglected. Conclusion: The findings highlight the complex nature of the follow-up and monitoring processes for prostate cancer patients. There is an urgent need for consensus in terms of monitoring frequency and referral pathways. Many patients do not engage in accurate monitoring post-treatment which has implications for early diagnosis of recurrence. Findings will be used to create an evidence-based, uniform Greater Manchester PSA monitoring service which is safe, acceptable and effective for allCitation
Johnson H, Taylor S, Peat S, Booker J, Yorke J. Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) monitoring in primary care after discharge from hospital-based follow-up following prostate cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2020:e13389.Journal
European Journal of Cancer CareDOI
10.1111/ecc.13389PubMed ID
33336540Additional Links
https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13389Type
ArticleLanguage
enae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/ecc.13389
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Initial experience of an algorithm-based protocol for the community follow-up of men with prostate cancer.
- Authors: Goodall PP, Little J, Robinson E, Trimble I, Cole OJ, Walton TJ
- Issue date: 2017 Jan
- GP experience and understandings of providing follow-up care in prostate cancer survivors in England.
- Authors: Margariti C, Gannon KN, Walsh JJ, Green JSA
- Issue date: 2020 Sep
- Follow-up in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Strict Protocol Adherence Remains Important for PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
- Authors: Soeterik TFW, van Melick HHE, Dijksman LM, Biesma DH, Witjes JA, van Basten JA
- Issue date: 2019 Sep
- Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014.
- Authors: Misra-Hebert AD, Hu B, Klein EA, Stephenson A, Taksler GB, Kattan MW, Rothberg MB
- Issue date: 2017 Aug
- Prostate-specific antigen testing in general practice: a survey among 325 general practitioners in Denmark.
- Authors: Jønler M, Eddy B, Poulsen J
- Issue date: 2005