• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Introducing magnetic resonance imaging into the lung cancer radiotherapy workflow e An assessment of patient experience

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Bellhouse, Sarah
    Brown, S
    Dubec, Michael
    Taylor, Sally
    Hales, Rosie
    Whiteside, Lee
    Yorke, Janelle
    Faivre-Finn, Corinne
    Affiliation
    Christie Patient Centred Research (CPCR), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK
    Issue Date
    2021
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior soft tissue contrast to computed tomography (CT), the current standard imaging modality for planning radiotherapy treatment. Improved soft tissue contrast could reduce uncertainties in identifying tumour and surrounding healthy tissues, potentially leading to improved outcomes in patients with lung cancer. This study explored patient experience of MR treatment planning scans in addition to a CT scan. Methods: Participants were recruited to the 'Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Delineation of Organs At Risk and Target Volumes in Lung Cancer Patients (MR-Lung)' study at a UK specialist cancer centre. Participants completed their standard of care radiotherapy planning CT scan and two additional MRI scans. Baseline and post-scan questionnaires were completed assessing anxiety and claustrophobia. Motion artefact during MRI was assessed by a modified visual grading analysis. Sixteen participants completed semi-structured interviews; transcripts were analysed thematically. Results: 29 people (66% female; aged 54e89 years) participated. Nineteen participants completed all imaging and 10 participants withdrew before completion. There was minimal adverse impact on state and scan-specific anxiety levels from completing the MRI scans. Completers experienced significantly less scan-specific anxiety during MRI 1 compared to non-completers (U ¼ 33, z ¼ 1.98, p < 0.05). 78% of those who withdrew during or post MRI 1 were positioned 'arms up'. Motion artefact negatively impacted image quality in 34% of scans. Participants commonly reported concerns during MRI; noise, claustrophobia and pain in upper limbs. Conclusion: Two thirds of participants tolerated two additional MR scans with minimal adverse impact on anxiety levels.
    Citation
    Bellhouse S, Brown S, Dubec M, Taylor S, Hales R, Whiteside L, et al. Introducing magnetic resonance imaging into the lung cancer radiotherapy workflow - An assessment of patient experience. Radiography (Lond). 2021;27(1):14-23.
    Journal
    Radiography
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/623712
    DOI
    10.1016/j.radi.2020.04.020
    PubMed ID
    32451307
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.04.020
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.radi.2020.04.020
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Investigating the impact of patient arm position in an MR-linac on liver SBRT treatment plans.
    • Authors: van den Wollenberg W, de Ruiter P, Nowee ME, Jansen EPM, Sonke JJ, Fast MF
    • Issue date: 2019 Nov
    • Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT for magnetic resonance-only based radiotherapy planning of lung cancer.
    • Authors: Wang H, Chandarana H, Block KT, Vahle T, Fenchel M, Das IJ
    • Issue date: 2017 Jun 26
    • Patient experience and perceived acceptability of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal and lung cancer compared with current staging scans: a qualitative study.
    • Authors: Evans R, Taylor S, Janes S, Halligan S, Morton A, Navani N, Oliver A, Rockall A, Teague J, Miles A, Streamline trials investigators
    • Issue date: 2017 Sep 6
    • [MRI Connecting Functions and Anatomy: A New Bridge for Radiotherapy].
    • Authors: Iima M, Iizuka Y, Matsuo Y, Takayama K, Nakamoto Y, Yamamoto A, Kataoka M, Ishimori T, Mizowaki T, Togashi K
    • Issue date: 2020
    • Compliance of volunteers in a fully-enclosed patient rotation system for MR-guided radiation therapy: a prospective study.
    • Authors: Beyer C, Paul KM, Dorsch S, Echner G, Dinkel F, Welzel T, Seidensaal K, Hörner-Rieber J, Jäkel O, Debus J, Klüter S
    • Issue date: 2024 Jun 8
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.