Introducing magnetic resonance imaging into the lung cancer radiotherapy workflow e An assessment of patient experience
Authors
Bellhouse, SarahBrown, S
Dubec, Michael
Taylor, Sally
Hales, Rosie
Whiteside, Lee
Yorke, Janelle
Faivre-Finn, Corinne
Affiliation
Christie Patient Centred Research (CPCR), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UKIssue Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior soft tissue contrast to computed tomography (CT), the current standard imaging modality for planning radiotherapy treatment. Improved soft tissue contrast could reduce uncertainties in identifying tumour and surrounding healthy tissues, potentially leading to improved outcomes in patients with lung cancer. This study explored patient experience of MR treatment planning scans in addition to a CT scan. Methods: Participants were recruited to the 'Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Delineation of Organs At Risk and Target Volumes in Lung Cancer Patients (MR-Lung)' study at a UK specialist cancer centre. Participants completed their standard of care radiotherapy planning CT scan and two additional MRI scans. Baseline and post-scan questionnaires were completed assessing anxiety and claustrophobia. Motion artefact during MRI was assessed by a modified visual grading analysis. Sixteen participants completed semi-structured interviews; transcripts were analysed thematically. Results: 29 people (66% female; aged 54e89 years) participated. Nineteen participants completed all imaging and 10 participants withdrew before completion. There was minimal adverse impact on state and scan-specific anxiety levels from completing the MRI scans. Completers experienced significantly less scan-specific anxiety during MRI 1 compared to non-completers (U ¼ 33, z ¼ 1.98, p < 0.05). 78% of those who withdrew during or post MRI 1 were positioned 'arms up'. Motion artefact negatively impacted image quality in 34% of scans. Participants commonly reported concerns during MRI; noise, claustrophobia and pain in upper limbs. Conclusion: Two thirds of participants tolerated two additional MR scans with minimal adverse impact on anxiety levels.Citation
Bellhouse S, Brown S, Dubec M, Taylor S, Hales R, Whiteside L, et al. Introducing magnetic resonance imaging into the lung cancer radiotherapy workflow - An assessment of patient experience. Radiography (Lond). 2021;27(1):14-23.Journal
RadiographyDOI
10.1016/j.radi.2020.04.020PubMed ID
32451307Additional Links
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.04.020Type
ArticleLanguage
enae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.radi.2020.04.020
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Investigating the impact of patient arm position in an MR-linac on liver SBRT treatment plans.
- Authors: van den Wollenberg W, de Ruiter P, Nowee ME, Jansen EPM, Sonke JJ, Fast MF
- Issue date: 2019 Nov
- Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT for magnetic resonance-only based radiotherapy planning of lung cancer.
- Authors: Wang H, Chandarana H, Block KT, Vahle T, Fenchel M, Das IJ
- Issue date: 2017 Jun 26
- Patient experience and perceived acceptability of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal and lung cancer compared with current staging scans: a qualitative study.
- Authors: Evans R, Taylor S, Janes S, Halligan S, Morton A, Navani N, Oliver A, Rockall A, Teague J, Miles A, Streamline trials investigators
- Issue date: 2017 Sep 6
- [MRI Connecting Functions and Anatomy: A New Bridge for Radiotherapy].
- Authors: Iima M, Iizuka Y, Matsuo Y, Takayama K, Nakamoto Y, Yamamoto A, Kataoka M, Ishimori T, Mizowaki T, Togashi K
- Issue date: 2020
- Compliance of volunteers in a fully-enclosed patient rotation system for MR-guided radiation therapy: a prospective study.
- Authors: Beyer C, Paul KM, Dorsch S, Echner G, Dinkel F, Welzel T, Seidensaal K, Hörner-Rieber J, Jäkel O, Debus J, Klüter S
- Issue date: 2024 Jun 8