• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Laparoscopic colorectal surgery outcomes improved after national training program (LAPCO) for specialists in England

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Hanna, G. B.
    Mackenzie, H.
    Miskovic, D.
    Ni, M.
    Wyles, S.
    Aylin, P.
    Parvaiz, A.
    Cecil, T.
    Gudgeon, A.
    Griffith, J.
    Robinson, J. M.
    Selvasekar, Chelliah
    Rockall, T.
    Acheson, A.
    Maxwell-Armstrong, C.
    Jenkins, J. T.
    Horgan, A.
    Cunningham, C.
    Lindsay, I.
    Arulampalam, T.
    Motson, R. W.
    Francis, N. K.
    Kennedy, R. H.
    Coleman, M. G.
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London.
    Issue Date
    2020
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Objective: To examine the impact of The National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (Lapco) on the rate of laparoscopic surgery and clinical outcomes of cases performed by Lapco surgeons after completion of training. Summery background data: Lapco provided competency-based supervised clinical training for specialist colorectal surgeons in England. Methods: We compared the rate of laparoscopic surgery, mortality and morbidity for colorectal cancer resections by Lapco delegates and non-Lapco surgeons in 3-year periods preceding and following Lapco using difference in differences analysis. The changes in the rate of post-Lapco laparoscopic surgery with the Lapco sign-off competency assessment and in-training global assessment scores were examined using risk-adjusted cumulative sum to determine their predictive clinical validity with predefined competent scores of 3 and 5 respectively. Results: 108 Lapco delegates performed 4586 elective colorectal resections pre-Lapco and 5115 post-Lapco while non-Lapco surgeons performed 72930 matched cases. Lapco delegates had a 37.8% increase in laparoscopic surgery which was greater than non-Lapco surgeons by 20.9% (95% CI, 18.5 to 23.3, p<0.001) with a relative decrease in 30-day mortality by -1.6% (95% CI, -3.4 to -0.2, p = 0.039) and 90-day mortality by -2.3% (95% CI, -4.3 to -0.4, p = 0.018). The change point of risk-adjusted cumulative sum was 3.12 for competency assessment tool and 4.74 for global assessment score whereas laparoscopic rate increased from 44% to 66% and 40% to 56% respectively. Conclusions: Lapco increased the rate of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery and reduced mortality and morbidity in England. In-training competency assessment tools predicted clinical performance after training.
    Citation
    Hanna GB, Mackenzie H, Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles S, Aylin P, et al. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Outcomes Improved After National Training Program (LAPCO) for Specialists in England. Ann Surg. 2020.
    Journal
    Annals of Surgery
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/623551
    DOI
    10.1097/sla.0000000000004584
    PubMed ID
    33086313
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000004584
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1097/sla.0000000000004584
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Design, delivery, and validation of a trainer curriculum for the national laparoscopic colorectal training program in England.
    • Authors: Mackenzie H, Cuming T, Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Langsford L, Anderson J, Thomas-Gibson S, Valori R, Hanna GB, Coleman MG, Francis N
    • Issue date: 2015 Jan
    • Is competency assessment at the specialist level achievable? A study for the national training programme in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England.
    • Authors: Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Kennedy RH, Francis NK, Parvaiz A, Cunningham C, Rockall TA, Gudgeon AM, Coleman MG, Hanna GB, National Training Programme in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in England
    • Issue date: 2013 Mar
    • What errors make a laparoscopic cancer surgery unsafe? An ad hoc analysis of competency assessment in the National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England.
    • Authors: Ni M, Mackenzie H, Widdison A, Jenkins JT, Mansfield S, Dixon T, Slade D, Coleman MG, Hanna GB
    • Issue date: 2016 Mar
    • The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.
    • Authors: Disbrow DE, Pannell SM, Shanker BA, Albright J, Wu J, Bastawrous A, Soliman M, Ferraro J, Cleary RK
    • Issue date: 2018 May-Jun
    • Objective assessment of technique in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: what are the existing tools?
    • Authors: Foster JD, Francis NK
    • Issue date: 2015 Jan
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.