Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhong, J.
dc.contributor.authorDatta, Anubhav
dc.contributor.authorGordon, T.
dc.contributor.authorAdams, S.
dc.contributor.authorGuo, T.
dc.contributor.authorAbdelaziz, M.
dc.contributor.authorBarbour, F.
dc.contributor.authorPalkhi, E.
dc.contributor.authorAdusumilli, P.
dc.contributor.authorOomerjee, M.
dc.contributor.authorLake, E.
dc.contributor.authorWalker, P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-08T05:36:40Z
dc.date.available2020-12-08T05:36:40Z
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.citationZhong J, Datta A, Gordon T, Adams S, Guo T, Abdelaziz M, et al. The Impact of COVID-19 on Interventional Radiology Services in the UK. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020:1-7.en
dc.identifier.pmid33145699en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00270-020-02692-2en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/623547
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has created unprecedented challenges on the healthcare system. The aim of this multi-centre study was to measure the impact of COVID-19 on IR services in the UK. Material and methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study of IR practice in six UK centres during the COVID-19 pandemic was carried out. All therapeutic IR procedures were identified using the respective hospital radiology information systems and COVID-19 status found on the hospital patient record systems. The total number of therapeutic IR procedures was recorded over two time periods, 25/03/2019-21/04/2019 (control group) and 30/03/2020-26/04/2020 (COVID-19 group). The data points collected were: procedure type, aerosol-generating nature, acute or elective case, modality used, in- or out-of-hours case and whether the procedure was done at the bedside (portable). Results: A 31% decrease in overall number of IR procedures was observed during COVID-19 compared to the control group (1363 cases vs 942 cases); however, the acute work decreased by only 0.5%. An increase in out-of-hours work by 10% was observed. COVID-19 was suspected or laboratory proved in 9.9% of cases (n = 93), and 15% of total cases (n = 141) were classed as aerosol-generating procedures. A 66% rise in cholecystostomy was noted during COVID-19. Image-guided ablation, IVC filters, aortic stent grafting and visceral vascular stenting had the greatest % decreases in practice during COVID-19, with 91.7%, 83.3%, 80.8% and 80.2% decreases, respectively. Conclusion: During the global pandemic, IR has continued to provide emergency and elective treatment highlighting the adaptability of IR in supporting other specialties.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02692-2en
dc.titleThe impact of COVID-19 on interventional radiology services in the UKen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.en
dc.identifier.journalCardiovascular and Interventional Radiologyen
dc.description.noteen]
refterms.dateFOA2020-12-08T10:16:58Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
33145699.pdf
Size:
453.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
From UNPAYWALL

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record