Checklists for complications during systemic cancer treatment shared by patients, friends, and health care professionals: prospective interventional cohort study
AuthorsJones, H. V.
Cooksley, Timothy J
Gwyn Murdoch, D.
AffiliationYsbyty Gwynedd, Penrhosgarnedd, Bangor,
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBackground: Advances in cancer management have been associated with an increased incidence of emergency presentations with disease- or treatment-related complications. Objective: This study aimed to measure the ability of patients and members of their social network to complete checklists for complications of systemic treatment for cancer and examine the impact on patient-centered and health-economic outcomes. Methods: A prospective interventional cohort study was performed to assess the impact of a smartphone app used by patients undergoing systemic cancer therapy and members of their network to monitor for common complications. The app was used by patients, a nominated "safety buddy," and acute oncology services. The control group was made up of patients from the same institution. Measures were based on process (completion of checklists over 60 days), patient experience outcomes (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the General version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy at baseline, 1 month, and 2 months) and health-economic outcomes (usage of appointments in primary care and elective and unscheduled hospital admissions). Results: At the conclusion of the study, 50 patients had completed 2882 checklists, and their 50 "safety buddies" had completed 318 checklists. Near daily usage was maintained over the 60-day study period. When compared to a cohort of 50 patients with matching disease profiles from the same institution, patients in the intervention group had comparable changes in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and General version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy. Patients in the Intervention Group required a third (32 vs 97 nights) of the hospital days with overnight stay compared to patients in the Control Group, though the difference was not significant. The question, "I feel safer with the checklist," received a mean score of 4.27 (SD 0.87) on a Likert scale (1-5) for patients and 4.55 (SD 0.65) for family and friends. Conclusions: Patients undergoing treatment for cancer and their close contacts can complete checklists for common complications of systemic treatments and take an active role in systems supporting their own safety. A larger sample size will be needed to assess the impact on clinical outcomes and health economics.
CitationJones HV, Smith H, Cooksley T, Jones P, Woolley T, Gwyn Murdoch D, et al. Checklists for Complications During Systemic Cancer Treatment Shared by Patients, Friends, and Health Care Professionals: Prospective Interventional Cohort Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(9):e19225.
JournalJMIR Mhealth and Uhealth
- Clinical Efficacy of Combined Surgical Patient Safety System and the World Health Organization's Checklists in Surgery: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
- Authors: Storesund A, Haugen AS, Flaatten H, Nortvedt MW, Eide GE, Boermeester MA, Sevdalis N, Tveiten Ø, Mahesparan R, Hjallen BM, Fevang JM, Størksen CH, Thornhill HF, Sjøen GH, Kolseth SM, Haaverstad R, Sandli OK, Søfteland E
- Issue date: 2020 Jul 1
- Randomized clinical trial of the impact of surgical ward-care checklists on postoperative care in a simulated environment.
- Authors: Pucher PH, Aggarwal R, Qurashi M, Singh P, Darzi A
- Issue date: 2014 Dec
- Introduction of surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada.
- Authors: Urbach DR, Govindarajan A, Saskin R, Wilton AS, Baxter NN
- Issue date: 2014 Mar 13
- Systematic review of safety checklists for use by medical care teams in acute hospital settings--limited evidence of effectiveness.
- Authors: Ko HC, Turner TJ, Finnigan MA
- Issue date: 2011 Sep 2
- Community-based care for chronic wound management: an evidence-based analysis.
- Authors: Medical Advisory Secretariat.
- Issue date: 2009