Hartmann's procedure versus intersphincteric abdominoperineal excision (HiP Study): a multicentre prospective cohort study
Collaborators, H. I. P.
AffiliationInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractAim: In patients with low rectal cancer it is occasionally necessary to avoid a low coloanal anastomosis due to patient frailty or poor function. In such situations there are two alternative approaches: Hartmann's procedure (HP) or intersphincteric abdominoperineal excision (IAPE). There are few data to guide surgeons as to which of these two procedures is the safest. The aim of this study was to determine the surgical complication rates associated with each procedure. Method: This was a multicentre, nonrandomized prospective cohort study of patients undergoing either HP or IAPE. The primary objective was to determine surgical complication rates. Secondary objectives included length of stay, time to adjuvant therapy and quality of life at 90 days. Results: One hundred and seventy nine patients were recruited between April 2016 and June 2019; approximately two thirds of patients underwent HP and one third IAPE. The overall complication rate was high in both groups (54% for the HP group and 52% for the IAPE group). Surgery-specific complication rates were also high, but not significantly different: 43% for HP and 48% for IAPE. The pelvic abscess rate in HP was 11% and was significantly higher in patients with a palpable staple line (15% vs 2%). There was a higher incidence of serious medical complications following IAPE (16% vs 5%), along with a reduction in 90-day quality of life scores. Conclusion: This is the largest prospective study to compare HP and IAPE in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery where primary anastomosis is not deemed appropriate. With similar complication rates, these data support the ongoing use of either HP or IAPE in this patient group.
CitationFowler H, Clifford R, Sutton P, Watson A, Fearnhead N, Bach S, et al. Hartmann's procedure versus intersphincteric abdominoperineal excision (HiP Study): a multicentre prospective cohort study. Colorectal Dis. 2020.
- A meta-analysis of low Hartmann's procedure versus abdominoperineal resection for non-restorative treatment of rectal cancer.
- Authors: Ahmad NZ, Azam M, Coffey JC
- Issue date: 2021 Dec
- Hartmann's procedure vs abdominoperineal resection with intersphincteric dissection in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized multicentre trial (HAPIrect).
- Authors: Smedh K, Sverrisson I, Chabok A, Nikberg M, HAPIrect Collaborative Study Group.
- Issue date: 2016 Jul 11
- Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid-Rectal Cancer Without Anastomosis: Low Hartmann's Operation or Intersphincteric Abdomino-Perineal Excision?
- Authors: Popiolek M, Dehlaghi K, Gadan S, Baban B, Matthiessen P
- Issue date: 2019 Sep
- What to do with the rectal stump during sphincter preserving rectal cancer resection with end colostomy: a collaborative snapshot study.
- Authors: Westerduin E, Aukema TS, van Geloven AAW, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, Dutch Snapshot Research Group.
- Issue date: 2018 Aug
- Rectal Cancer Surgery in Patients Older Than 80 Years: Is Hartmann's Procedure Safe?
- Authors: Iguchi K, Mushiake H, Hasegawa S, Inagaki D, Fukushima T, Numata M, Tamagawa H, Yukawa N, Rino Y, Masuda M
- Issue date: 2020 Nov-Dec