Density compensated diodes for small field dosimetry: comprehensive testing and implications for design
Wurfel, J. U.
Thompson, J. M.
Hill, M. A.
Rowbottom, C. G.
Fenwick, J. D.
AffiliationDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool,Liverpool L69 3BX
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractPurpose: In small megavoltage photon fields, the accuracies of an unmodified PTW 60017-type diode dosimeter and six diodes modified by adding airgaps of thickness 0.6-1.6 mm and diameter 3.6 mm have been comprehensively characterized experimentally and computationally. The optimally thick airgap for density compensation was determined, and detectors were micro-CT imaged to investigate differences between experimentally measured radiation responses and those predicted computationally. Methods: Detectors were tested onand off-axis, at 5 and 15 cm depths in 6 and 15 MV fields ≥ 0.5 × 0.5 cm2. Computational studies were carried out using the EGSnrc/BEAMnrc Monte Carlo radiation transport code. Experimentally, radiation was delivered using a Varian TrueBeam linac and doses absorbed by water were measured using Gafchromic EBT3 film and ionization chambers, and compared with diode readings. Detector response was characterized via the [Formula: see text] formalism, choosing a 4 × 4 cm2 reference field. Results: For the unmodified 60017 diode, the maximum error in small field doses obtained from diode readings uncorrected by [Formula: see text] factors was determined as 11.9% computationally at +0.25 mm off-axis and 5 cm depth in a 15 MV 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 field, and 11.7% experimentally at -0.30 mm off-axis and 5 cm depth in the same field. A detector modified to include a 1.6 mm thick airgap performed best, with maximum computationally and experimentally determined errors of 2.2% and 4.1%. The 1.6 mm airgap deepened the modified dosimeter's effective point of measurement by 0.5 mm. For some detectors significant differences existed between responses in small fields determined computationally and experimentally, micro-CT imaging indicating that these differences were due to within-tolerance variations in the thickness of an epoxy resin layer. Conclusions: The dosimetric performance of a 60017 diode detector was comprehensively improved throughout 6 and 15 MV small photon fields via density compensation. For this approach to work well with good detector-to-detector reproducibility, tolerances on dense component dimensions should be reduced to limit associated variations of response in small fields, or these components should be modified to have more water-like densities.
CitationGeorgiou G, Kumar S, Wurfel JU, Underwood TSA, Thompson JM, Hill MA, et al. Density compensated diodes for small field dosimetry: comprehensive testing and implications for design. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65(15):155011.
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
- A novel method for the determination of field output factors and output correction factors for small static fields for six diodes and a microdiamond detector in megavoltage photon beams.
- Authors: Casar B, Gershkevitsh E, Mendez I, Jurković S, Huq MS
- Issue date: 2019 Feb
- Determination of the KQclinfclin,Qmsr fmsr correction factors for detectors used with an 800 MU/min CyberKnife(®) system equipped with fixed collimators and a study of detector response to small photon beams using a Monte Carlo method.
- Authors: Moignier C, Huet C, Makovicka L
- Issue date: 2014 Jul
- Relative dosimetry with an MR-linac: Response of ion chambers, diamond, and diode detectors for off-axis, depth dose, and output factor measurements.
- Authors: O'Brien DJ, Dolan J, Pencea S, Schupp N, Sawakuchi GO
- Issue date: 2018 Feb
- Output correction factors for nine small field detectors in 6 MV radiation therapy photon beams: a PENELOPE Monte Carlo study.
- Authors: Benmakhlouf H, Sempau J, Andreo P
- Issue date: 2014 Apr
- 6-MV small field output factors: intra-/intermachine comparison and implementation of TRS-483 using various detectors and several linear accelerators.
- Authors: Ghazal M, Westermark M, Kaveckyte V, Carlsson-Tedgren Å, Benmakhlouf H
- Issue date: 2019 Nov