• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Looking through the eyes of the multidisciplinary team: the design and clinical evaluation of a decision support system for lung cancer care

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    32953514.pdf
    Size:
    1.580Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    From UNPAYWALL
    Download
    Authors
    Pluyter, J. R.
    Jacobs, I.
    Langereis, S.
    Cobben, David
    Williams, S.
    Curfs, J.
    van den Borne, B.
    Affiliation
    Philips Experience Design, High Tech Campus 33, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
    Issue Date
    2020
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: Decision-making in lung cancer is complex due to a rapidly increasing amount of diagnostic data and treatment options. The need for timely and accurate diagnosis and delivery of care demands high-quality multidisciplinary team (MDT) collaboration and coordination. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can potentially support MDTs in constructing a shared mental model of a patient case. This enables the team to assess the strength and completeness of collected diagnostic data, stratification for the right personalized therapy driven by clinical stage and other treatment-influencing factors, and adapt care management strategies when needed. Current CDSSs often have a suboptimal fit into the decision-making workflow, which hampers their impact in clinical practice. Methods: A CDSS for multidisciplinary decision-making in lung cancer was designed to support the abovementioned goals through presentation of relevant clinical data in line with existing mental model structures of the MDT members. The CDSS was tested in a simulated multidisciplinary tumor board meeting for primary diagnosis and treatment selection, based on de-identified primary lung cancer cases (n=8). Decision course analysis, eye-tracking data and questionnaires were used to assess the impact of the CDSS on constructing shared mental models to improve the decision-making process and outcome. Results: The CDSS supported the team in their self-correcting capacity for accurate diagnosis and TNM classification. It enabled cross-validation of diagnostic findings, surfaced discordance between diagnostic tests and facilitated cancer staging according the diagnostic evidence, as well as spotting contra-indications for personalized treatment selection. Conclusions: This study shows the potential of CDSS on clinical decision making, when these systems are properly designed in line with clinical thinking. The presented setup enables assessment of the impact of CDSS design on clinical decision making and optimization of CDSSs to maximize their effect on decision quality and confidence.
    Citation
    Pluyter JR, Jacobs I, Langereis S, Cobben D, Williams S, Curfs J, et al. Looking through the eyes of the multidisciplinary team: the design and clinical evaluation of a decision support system for lung cancer care. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020;9(4):1422-32.
    Journal
    Translational Lung Cancer Research
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/623312
    DOI
    10.21037/tlcr-19-441
    PubMed ID
    32953514
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-19-441
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.21037/tlcr-19-441
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Clinical decision support systems for multidisciplinary team decision-making in patients with solid cancer: Composition of an implementation model based on a scoping review.
    • Authors: Hendriks MP, Jager A, Ebben KCWJ, van Til JA, Siesling S
    • Issue date: 2024 Mar
    • GC-CDSS: Personalized gastric cancer treatment recommendations system based on knowledge graph.
    • Authors: Li S, Li Z, Xue K, Zhou X, Ding C, Shao Y, Zhang S, Ruan T, Zheng M, Sun J
    • Issue date: 2024 May
    • Design and evaluation of a Mobile-Based decision support system to enhance lung transplant candidate assessment and management: knowledge translation integrated with clinical workflow.
    • Authors: Abtahi H, Shahmoradi L, Amini S, Gholamzadeh M
    • Issue date: 2023 Aug 1
    • Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in practice: Results from a multi-institutional quantitative survey and implications for policy change.
    • Authors: Rankin NM, Lai M, Miller D, Beale P, Spigelman A, Prest G, Turley K, Simes J
    • Issue date: 2018 Feb
    • The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.
    • Authors: Robertson J, Walkom E, Pearson SA, Hains I, Williamsone M, Newby D
    • Issue date: 2010 Apr
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.