• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Cost-effectiveness analysis of stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy compared with surgery and radiofrequency ablation in two patient cohorts: metastatic liver cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Jin, H.
    Chalkidou, A.
    Hawkins, M.
    Summers, J.
    Eddy, S.
    Peacock, J. L.
    Coker, B.
    Kartha, M. R.
    Good, J.
    Pennington, M
    Slevin, Nicholas J
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    King's Health Economics (KHE), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK.
    Issue Date
    2020
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Aims: To compare the cost-effectiveness of stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) with radiofrequency ablation and surgery in adult patients with metastatic liver cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and methods: Two patient cohorts were assessed: liver oligometastases and HCC. For each patient cohort, a decision analytic model was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of interventions over a 5-year horizon. A Markov process was embedded in the decision model to simulate the possible prognosis of cancer. Data on transition probabilities, survival, side-effects, quality of life and costs were obtained from published sources and the SABR Commissioning through Evaluation (CtE) scheme. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio with respect to quality-adjusted life-years. The robustness of the results was examined in a sensitivity analysis. Analyses were conducted from a National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective. Results: In the base case analysis, which assumed that all three interventions were associated with the same cancer progression rates and mortality rates, SABR was the most cost-effective intervention for both patient cohorts. This conclusion was sensitive to the cancer progression rate, mortality rate and cost of interventions. Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the probability that SABR is cost-effective was 57% and 50% in liver oligometastases and HCC, respectively. Conclusions: Our results indicate a potential for SABR to be cost-effective for patients with liver oligometastases and HCC. This finding supports further investigation in clinical trials directly comparing SABR with surgery and radiofrequency ablation.
    Citation
    Jin H, Chalkidou A, Hawkins M, Summers J, Eddy S, Peacock JL, et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy Compared With Surgery and Radiofrequency Ablation in Two Patient Cohorts: Metastatic Liver Cancer and Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2020.
    Journal
    Clinical Oncology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/623311
    DOI
    10.1016/j.clon.2020.08.010
    PubMed ID
    32951952
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2020.08.010
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.clon.2020.08.010
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Oligometastatic Tumors versus Standard of Care.
    • Authors: Raymakers AJN, Cameron D, Tyldesley S, Regier DA
    • Issue date: 2021 May 13
    • Cost-effectiveness of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Markov Modeling Study.
    • Authors: Pollom EL, Lee K, Durkee BY, Grade M, Mokhtari DA, Wahl DR, Feng M, Kothary N, Koong AC, Owens DK, Goldhaber-Fiebert J, Chang DT
    • Issue date: 2017 May
    • A randomised controlled trial of Standard Of Care versus RadioAblaTion in Early Stage HepatoCellular Carcinoma (SOCRATES HCC).
    • Authors: Wigg A, Tibballs J, Woodman R, Stuart K, Le H, Roberts SK, Olynyk JK, Strasser SI, Wallace M, Martin J, Haworth A, Hardcastle N, Loo KF, Tang C, Lee YY, Chu J, De Abreu Lourenco R, Koukourou A, De Boo D, McLean K, Buck J, Sawhney R, Nicoll A, Dev A, Wood M, Braund A, Weltman M, Khor R, Levy M, Wang T, Potter M, Haridy J, Raj A, Duncan O, Zekry A, Collier N, O'Beirne J, Holliday C, Trada Y, Tronidjaja J, George J, Pryor D
    • Issue date: 2024 Jul 8
    • Cost-Effectiveness of Single Versus Multifraction SABR for Pulmonary Oligometastases: The SAFRON II Trial.
    • Authors: Lourenco RA, Khoo T, Crothers A, Haas M, Montgomery R, Ball D, Bressel M, Siva S
    • Issue date: 2022 Dec 1
    • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Compared With Radiofrequency Ablation for Inoperable Colorectal Liver Metastases.
    • Authors: Kim H, Gill B, Beriwal S, Huq MS, Roberts MS, Smith KJ
    • Issue date: 2016 Jul 15
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.