IPEM Topical Report: An evidence and risk assessment based analysis of the efficacy of quality assurance tests on fluoroscopy units part II; image quality
Authors
Shaw, DanielWorrall, M.
Baker, C.
Charnock, P.
Fazakerley, J.
Honey, I.
Iball, G. R.
Koutalonis, M.
Price, M.
Renaud, C.
Rose, A.
Wood, T. J.
Affiliation
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.Issue Date
2020
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This work aims to assess the efficacy of x-ray quality assurance tests undertaken on fluoroscopy units in the UK. Information was gathered on the results of image quality tests recommended by the reports of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, and those additionally undertaken by medical physics departments. The assessment of efficacy considers the frequency with which a test result breaches the remedial level or other relevant threshold where applicable. The third quartile of those results exceeding the remedial level or threshold is used to estimate the severity of such a breach in terms of potential impact on patient dose and image quality. A risk assessment approach is then used to recommend to what degree, if any, the test should be included in an on-going test regimen. Data was analysed from 469 testing sessions to 337 unique fluoroscopy units throughout the UK. Across all tests, the rate with which the remedial level was exceeded varied from 0 10.6%, with severity ranging from little or none to major degradation to image quality or significant increase on population dose. Where possible, the data has also been used to produce representative ranges for the results of image quality tests. These could be useful as an up to date comparator for those sites considering the purchase of or commissioning new equipment. Overall the results indicate a wide range for the efficacy of those tests undertaken at present; this can be used to review local test protocols and to inform future changes to national guidance in the UK. The results also highlight some tests where measurement technique varies significantly throughout the UK, making any valid comparison difficult. This may indicate a need for further guidance on how best to undertake these tests.Citation
Shaw D, Worrall M, Baker C, Charnock P, Fazakerley J, Honey I, et al. IPEM Topical Report: An evidence and risk assessment based analysis of the efficacy of quality assurance tests on fluoroscopy units part II; image quality. Phys Med Biol. 2020.Journal
Physics in Medicine and BiologyDOI
10.1088/1361-6560/abb92fPubMed ID
32937602Additional Links
https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/abb92fType
ArticleLanguage
enae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1088/1361-6560/abb92f
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- IPEM Topical Report: an evidence and risk assessment based analysis of the efficacy of quality assurance tests on fluoroscopy units-part I; dosimetry and safety.
- Authors: Worrall M, Shaw D, Baker C, Charnock P, Fazakerley J, Honey I, Iball G, Koutalonis M, Price M, Renaud C, Rose A, Wood T
- Issue date: 2019 Oct 7
- IPEM Topical Report: an evidence and risk assessment based analysis of the efficacy of tube and generator quality assurance tests on general x-ray units.
- Authors: Honey I, Rose A, Baker C, Charnock P, Fazakerley J, Iball G, Koutalonis M, Price M, Renaud C, Shaw D, Wood T, Worrall M
- Issue date: 2018 Dec 12
- Functionality and operation of fluoroscopic automatic brightness control/automatic dose rate control logic in modern cardiovascular and interventional angiography systems: a report of Task Group 125 Radiography/Fluoroscopy Subcommittee, Imaging Physics Committee, Science Council.
- Authors: Rauch P, Lin PJ, Balter S, Fukuda A, Goode A, Hartwell G, LaFrance T, Nickoloff E, Shepard J, Strauss K
- Issue date: 2012 May
- Subjective and objective measures of image quality in digital fluoroscopy.
- Authors: Walsh C, Dowling A, Meade A, Malone J
- Issue date: 2005
- A survey of fluoroscopic equipment in Victoria.
- Authors: Boal TJ, Dessent KW, Facci M
- Issue date: 1998 Dec