Comparison of radiographer interobserver image registration variability using cone beam CT and MR for cervix radiotherapy
van Herk, Marcel
Hoskin, Peter J
Eccles, Cynthia L
AffiliationDepartment of Radiotherapy, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to assess the consistency of therapy radiographers performing image registration using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-CT, magnetic resonance (MR)-CT, and MR-MR image guidance for cervix cancer radiotherapy and to assess that MR-based image guidance is not inferior to CBCT standard practice. Methods: 10 patients receiving cervix radiation therapy underwent daily CBCT guidance and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging weekly during treatment. Offline registration of each MR image, and corresponding CBCT, to planning CT was performed by five radiographers. MR images were also registered to the earliest MR interobserver variation was assessed using modified Bland-Altman analysis with clinically acceptable 95% limits of agreement (LoA) defined as ±5.0 mm. Results: 30 CBCT-CT, 30 MR-CT and 20 MR-MR registrations were performed by each observer. Registration variations between CBCT-CT and MR-CT were minor and both strategies resulted in 95% LoA over the clinical threshold in the anteroposterior direction (CBCT-CT ±5.8 mm, MR-CT ±5.4 mm). MR-MR registrations achieved a significantly improved 95% LoA in the anteroposterior direction (±4.3 mm). All strategies demonstrated similar results in lateral and longitudinal directions. Conclusion: The magnitude of interobserver variations between CBCT-CT and MR-CT were similar, confirming that MR-CT radiotherapy workflows are comparable to CBCT-CT image-guided radiotherapy. Our results suggest MR-MR radiotherapy workflows may be a superior registration strategy. Advances in knowledge: This is the first publication quantifying interobserver registration of multimodality image registration strategies for cervix radical radiotherapy patients.
CitationRodgers J, Hales R, Whiteside L, Parker J, McHugh L, Cree A, et al. Comparison of radiographer interobserver image registration variability using cone beam CT and MR for cervix radiotherapy. The British journal of radiology. 2020;93(1112):20200169.
JournalBritish Journal of Radiology
- Combined Ultrasound and Cone Beam CT Improves Target Segmentation for Image Guided Radiation Therapy in Uterine Cervix Cancer.
- Authors: Mason SA, White IM, O'Shea T, McNair HA, Alexander S, Kalaitzaki E, Bamber JC, Harris EJ, Lalondrelle S
- Issue date: 2019 Jul 1
- Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure.
- Authors: McNair HA, Harris EJ, Hansen VN, Thomas K, South C, Hafeez S, Huddart R, Dearnaley DP
- Issue date: 2015 Oct
- The accuracy of Magnetic Resonance - Cone Beam Computed Tomography soft-tissue matching for prostate radiotherapy.
- Authors: Wyatt JJ, Brooks RL, Ainslie D, Wilkins E, Raven E, Pilling K, Pearson RA, McCallum HM
- Issue date: 2019 Oct
- Assessment of cone beam CT registration for prostate radiation therapy: fiducial marker and soft tissue methods.
- Authors: Deegan T, Owen R, Holt T, Fielding A, Biggs J, Parfitt M, Coates A, Roberts L
- Issue date: 2015 Feb
- [Interobserver variability study for daily cone beam computed tomography registration of prostate volumetric modulated arc therapy].
- Authors: Zahra N, Monnet C, Bartha E, Bouilhol G, Boydev C, Courbis M, Le Grévellec M, Bosset M, Zouai M, Fleury B, Clippe S
- Issue date: 2015 Aug