Prognostic indices in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: an analysis of the UK National Cancer Research Institute R-CHOP 14 versus 21 phase 3 trial
Authors
Gleeson, M.Counsell, N.
Cunningham, D.
Lawrie, A.
Clifton-Hadley, L.
Hawkes, E.
McMillan, A.
Ardeshna, K. M.
Burton, C.
Chadwick, N.
Gambell, J.
Smith, P.
Mouncey, P.
Pocock, C.
Radford, John A
Davies, J.
Turner, D.
Kruger, A.
Johnson, P.
Linch, D.
Affiliation
The Royal Marsden Hospital, London and Surrey, London, UK.Issue Date
2020
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We compared the International Prognostic Index (IPI), Revised (R)-IPI and age-adjusted (aa)-IPI as prognostic indices for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the UK National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) R-CHOP 14 versus 21 trial (N = 1080). The R-IPI and aa-IPI showed no marked improvement compared to the IPI for overall and progression-free survival, in terms of model fit or discrimination. Similar results were observed in exploratory analyses incorporating the Grupo Espanol de Linfomas/Transplante de Medula Osea (GELTAMO)-IPI, where baseline beta2-microglobulin data were available (N = 655). Although our findings support current use of the IPI, a novel prognostic tool to better delineate a high-risk DLBCL group in the rituximab era is needed.Citation
M. Gleeson, N. Counsell, D. Cunningham et al. Prognostic indices in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: an analysis of the UK National Cancer Research Institute R-CHOP 14 versus 21 phase 3 trial. Br J Haematol. 2020.Journal
British Journal of HaematologyDOI
10.1111/bjh.16691PubMed ID
32436212Additional Links
https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.16691Type
ArticleLanguage
enae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/bjh.16691