Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer (PulMiCC): Updated analysis of 93 randomised patients - control survival is much better than previously assumed
Williams, N. R.
AffiliationThoracic Surgery Clinic, Institute for Lung Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia.
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractAIMS: Lung metastases from colorectal cancer are resected in selected patients in the belief that this confers a significant survival advantage. It is generally assumed that the five-year survival of these patients would be near zero without metastasectomy. We have tested the clinical effectiveness of this practice in PulMiCC, a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. METHODS: Multidisciplinary teams in 14 hospitals recruited patients with resectable lung metastases into a two-arm trial. Randomisation was remote and stratified by site with minimisation for age, sex, primary cancer stage, interval since primary resection, prior liver involvement, number of metastases, and carcinoembryonic antigen. The trial management group were blind to patient allocation until after intention to treat analysis. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2016, 93 participants were randomised, aged 35 to 86 years, with 1-6 lung metastases at a median of 2.7 years after colorectal cancer resection. 29% had prior liver metastasectomy. Characteristics were well-matched and similar to observational studies. The median survival after metastasectomy was 3.5 years (95%CI:3.1,6.6) compared with 3.8 years (95%CI:3.1,4.6) for controls. The estimated unadjusted hazard ratio for death within five years, comparing metastasectomy to control, was 0.93 (95%CI:0.56,1.56). Use of chemotherapy or local ablation was infrequent and similar in each group. CONCLUSIONS: The control group patients who do not have lung metastasectomy have better survival than is assumed. Survival in the metastasectomy group are comparable with the many single arm follow-up studies. The groups were well matched with features similar to reported case series.
CitationM. Milosevic, J. Edwards, D. Tsang et al. Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC): Updated analysis of 93 randomised patients - control survival is much better than previously assumed. Colorectal Dis. 2020.
- Pulmonary Metastasectomy versus Continued Active Monitoring in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC): a multicentre randomised clinical trial.
- Authors: Treasure T, Farewell V, Macbeth F, Monson K, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Lees B, Grigg O, Fallowfield L, PulMiCC Trial Group.
- Issue date: 2019 Dec 12
- Outcomes and prognostic factors after pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with colorectal cancer with previously resected hepatic metastases.
- Authors: Shimizu K, Ohtaki Y, Okumura T, Boku N, Horio H, Takenoyama M, Yamashita M, Hyodo I, Mori K, Kondo H
- Issue date: 2019 May
- Survival after lung metastasectomy in colorectal cancer patients with previously resected liver metastases.
- Authors: Gonzalez M, Robert JH, Halkic N, Mentha G, Roth A, Perneger T, Ris HB, Gervaz P
- Issue date: 2012 Feb
- Outcomes after hepatic and pulmonary metastasectomies compared with pulmonary metastasectomy alone in patients with colorectal cancer metastasis to liver and lungs.
- Authors: Hattori N, Kanemitsu Y, Komori K, Shimizu Y, Sano T, Senda Y, Mitsudomi T, Fukui T
- Issue date: 2013 Jun
- Individual data meta-analysis for the study of survival after pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer patients: A history of resected liver metastases worsens the prognosis.
- Authors: Zabaleta J, Iida T, Falcoz PE, Salah S, Jarabo JR, Correa AM, Zampino MG, Matsui T, Cho S, Ardissone F, Watanabe K, Gonzalez M, Gervaz P, Emparanza JI, Abraira V
- Issue date: 2018 Jul