Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAitken, K.
dc.contributor.authorGood, J.
dc.contributor.authorHawkins, M.
dc.contributor.authorGrose, D.
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, S.
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, M.
dc.contributor.authorRadhakrishna, Ganesh
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-16T11:03:11Z
dc.date.available2020-06-16T11:03:11Z
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.citationK. Aitken, J. Good, M. Hawkins et al. Liver Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy: an Effective and Feasible Alternative to Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2020en
dc.identifier.pmid32387045en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clon.2020.04.012en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/623015
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 pandemic is having an unprecedented impact on UK cancer services. Access to radical surgery has been severely restricted and resources for systemic therapy provision are being limited as the crisis unfolds. Radiotherapy resources are rightly being focused on patients being treated with curative intent. However, it is our experience that access to stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is diminishing, predominantly due to staffing shortages. SABR offers a non-invasive, outpatient ablative approach with minimal hospital footfall and with lower immunosuppressive risks than chemotherapy. The recently published long-term outcomes of the SABR COMET study illustrate the ability of SABR to substantially impact survival across tumour types [1]. The NHS England Commissioning through Evaluation process has shown that SABR can be safely delivered in the UK [2,3]. SABR requires specialist multidisciplinary expertise. The majority of radiotherapy departments are planning to maintain their capacity for category 1?4 treatments [4] and many have therefore suspended SABR for oligometastatic disease. However, we are concerned that diminishing access to SABR, at a time when access to other curative local treatment modalities is already restricted, will result in poorer patient outcomes in the short and medium term when this need not be the case. Patients with liver-limited colorectal cancer have a 5-year survival of 40% following surgery [5]. Given the evidence supporting SABR for colorectal liver metastases [6], we believe that this should be prioritised if patients are unable to access surgery and interventional ablative techniques. Similarly, SABR should be considered for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma while access to other services (particularly transplant) is limited. We urge radiotherapy departments to preserve access to SABR for patients in these situations, particularly as the COVID-19 pandemic wanes and staffing levels allow the re-establishment of normal services.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2020.04.012en
dc.titleLiver stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: an effective and feasible alternative to surgery during the COVID-19 pandemicen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.en
dc.identifier.journalClinical Oncologyen
dc.description.noteen]
refterms.dateFOA2020-06-16T14:59:47Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
32387045.pdf
Size:
137.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
From UNPAYWALL

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record