Association of indoor tanning regulations with health and economic outcomes in North America and Europe
AffiliationPopulation Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractIMPORTANCE: UV radiation emissions from indoor tanning devices are carcinogenic. Regulatory actions may be associated with reduced exposure of UV radiation at a population level. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the long-term health and economic consequences of banning indoor tanning devices or prohibiting their use by minors only in North America and Europe compared with ongoing current levels of use. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This economic analysis modeled data for individuals 12 to 35 years old in North America and Europe, who commonly engage in indoor tanning. A Markov cohort model was used with outcomes projected during the cohort's remaining life-years. Models were populated by extracting data from high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses, epidemiologic reports, and cancer registrations. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Main outcomes were numbers of melanomas and deaths from melanoma, numbers of keratinocyte carcinomas, life-years, and health care and productivity costs. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the stability of results. RESULTS: In an estimated population of 110 932 523 in the United States and Canada and 141 970 492 in Europe, for the next generation of youths and young adults during their remaining lifespans, regulatory actions that ban indoor tanning devices could be expected to gain 423 000 life-years, avert 240 000 melanomas (-8.2%), and avert 7.3 million keratinocyte carcinomas (-7.8%) in North America and gain 460 000 life-years, avert 204 000 melanomas (-4.9%), and avert 2.4 million keratinocyte carcinomas (-4.4%) in Europe compared with ongoing current levels of use. Economic cost savings of US $31.1 billion in North America and €21.1 billion (US $15.9 billion) in Europe could occur. Skin cancers averted and cost savings after prohibiting indoor tanning by minors may be associated with one-third of the corresponding benefits of a total ban. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Banning indoor tanning may be associated with reduced skin cancer burden and health care costs. Corresponding gains from prohibiting indoor tanning by minors only may be smaller.
CitationGordon LG, Rodriguez-Acevedo AJ, Koster B, Guy GP, Jr., Sinclair C, Van Deventer E, et al. Association of Indoor Tanning Regulations With Health and Economic Outcomes in North America and Europe. JAMA Dermatol. 2020.
- The potential impact of reducing indoor tanning on melanoma prevention and treatment costs in the United States: An economic analysis.
- Authors: Guy GP Jr, Zhang Y, Ekwueme DU, Rim SH, Watson M
- Issue date: 2017 Feb
- The Growing Public Health Challenges of Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation From Use of Indoor Tanning Devices in the United States.
- Authors: Bowman DM, Lewis RC, Lee MS, Yao CJ
- Issue date: 2015 Aug
- Indoor tanning and skin cancer in Canada: A meta-analysis and attributable burden estimation.
- Authors: O'Sullivan DE, Brenner DR, Demers PA, Villeneuve PJ, Friedenreich CM, King WD, ComPARe Study Group.
- Issue date: 2019 Apr
- Update on indoor tanning legislation in the United States.
- Authors: Pan M, Geller L
- Issue date: 2015 May-Jun
- Adverse effects of ultraviolet radiation from the use of indoor tanning equipment: time to ban the tan.
- Authors: Lim HW, James WD, Rigel DS, Maloney ME, Spencer JM, Bhushan R
- Issue date: 2011 Apr