Comparison of complications after transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy: a national population-based study
van der Meulen, J
Clarke, Noel W
AffiliationDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractOBJECTIVES: To assess the complications of transrectal (TR) compared to transperineal prostate (TP) biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1st April 2014 and 2017 in England were identified by the National Prostate Cancer Audit. Administrative hospital data were then used to categorise the type of prostate biopsy and subsequent complications requiring hospital admission. Administrative hospital data were used to identify patients staying overnight immediately after biopsy and those readmitted separately for hospital admissions because of sepsis, urinary retention or haematuria. Procedure related mortality and total length of hospital stay within 30 days was also recorded. Generalised linear models were used to calculate adjusted risk differences (aRD). RESULTS: 73,630 men undergoing prostate biopsy were identified. Those having TP biopsy (n=13,723) were more likely to have an overnight hospital stay (12.3% vs 2.4%; aRD 9.7%: 95% CI 7.1% to 12.3%), were less likely to be readmitted because of sepsis (1.0% vs 1.4%; aRD -0.4%: CI -0.6% to -0.2%), and were more likely to be readmitted with urinary retention (1.9% vs 1.0%; aRD 1.1%: CI 0.7% to 1.4%) than those undergoing a TR biopsy (n=59,907). There were no significant differences in the risk of haematuria or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: TP biopsy has a lower risk of readmission for sepsis but a higher risk of readmission for urinary retention than TR biopsy. Use of the TP route would prevent one readmission for sepsis in 278 men at the cost of three additional men readmitted for urinary retention.
CitationBerry B, Parry MG, Sujenthiran A, Nossiter J, Cowling TE, Aggarwal A, et al. Comparison of complications after transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy: a national population-based study. BJU Int. 2020.
- The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
- Authors: Fabiani A, Principi E, Filosa A, Servi L
- Issue date: 2017 Oct 3
- The clinical and financial implications of a decade of prostate biopsies in the NHS: analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics data 2008-2019.
- Authors: Tamhankar AS, El-Taji O, Vasdev N, Foley C, Popert R, Adshead J
- Issue date: 2020 Jul
- A Retrospective Comparison of Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsies: Experience of a Single Surgeon.
- Authors: Young R, Norris B, Reeves F, Peters JS
- Issue date: 2019 Jun
- Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy under intravenous anaesthesia: a clinical, microbiological and cost analysis of 2048 cases over 11 years at a tertiary institution.
- Authors: Roberts MJ, Macdonald A, Ranasinghe S, Bennett H, Teloken PE, Harris P, Paterson D, Coughlin G, Dunglison N, Esler R, Gardiner RA, Elliott T, Gordon L, Yaxley J
- Issue date: 2020 Aug 5
- Comparisons of cancer detection rate and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy approaches - a single center preliminary study.
- Authors: Huang GL, Kang CH, Lee WC, Chiang PH
- Issue date: 2019 Oct 28