Effect of single-fraction vs multifraction radiotherapy on ambulatory status among patients with spinal canal compression from metastatic cancer: The SCORAD randomized clinical trial
dc.contributor.author | Hoskin, Peter J | |
dc.contributor.author | Hopkins, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Misra, Vivek | |
dc.contributor.author | Holt, T | |
dc.contributor.author | McMenemin, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Dubois, D | |
dc.contributor.author | McKinna, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Foran, B | |
dc.contributor.author | Madhavan, K | |
dc.contributor.author | MacGregor, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Bates, A | |
dc.contributor.author | O'Rourke, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Lester, JF | |
dc.contributor.author | Sevitt, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Roos, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Dixit, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Brown, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Arnott, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Thomas, SS | |
dc.contributor.author | Forsyth, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Beare, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Reczko, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Hackshaw, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Lopes, A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-29T15:17:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-29T15:17:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Hoskin PJ, Hopkins K, Misra V, Holt T, McMenemin R, Dubois D, et al. Effect of Single-Fraction vs Multifraction Radiotherapy on Ambulatory Status Among Patients With Spinal Canal Compression From Metastatic Cancer: The SCORAD Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama. 2019;322(21):2084-94. | en |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31794625 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1001/jama.2019.17913 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10541/622641 | |
dc.description.abstract | IMPORTANCE: Malignant spinal canal compression, a major complication of metastatic cancer, is managed with radiotherapy to maintain mobility and relieve pain, although there is no standard radiotherapy regimen. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether single-fraction radiotherapy is noninferior to 5 fractions of radiotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted in 42 UK and 5 Australian radiotherapy centers. Eligible patients (n?=?686) had metastatic cancer with spinal cord or cauda equina compression, life expectancy greater than 8 weeks, and no previous radiotherapy to the same area. Patients were recruited between February 2008 and April 2016, with final follow-up in September 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive external beam single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy (n?=?345) or 20 Gy of radiotherapy in 5 fractions over 5 consecutive days (n?=?341). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was ambulatory status at week 8, based on a 4-point scale and classified as grade 1 (ambulatory without the use of aids and grade 5 of 5 muscle power) or grade 2 (ambulatory using aids or grade 4 of 5 muscle power). The noninferiority margin for the difference in ambulatory status was -11%. Secondary end points included ambulatory status at weeks 1, 4, and 12 and overall survival. RESULTS: Among 686 randomized patients (median [interquartile range] age, 70 [64-77] years; 503 (73%) men; 44% had prostate cancer, 19% had lung cancer, and 12% had breast cancer), 342 (49.8%) were analyzed for the primary end point (255 patients died before the 8-week assessment). Ambulatory status grade 1 or 2 at week 8 was achieved by 115 of 166 (69.3%) patients in the single-fraction group vs 128 of 176 (72.7%) in the multifraction group (difference, -3.5% [1-sided 95% CI, -11.5% to °]; P value for noninferiority?=?.06). The difference in ambulatory status grade 1 or 2 in the single-fraction vs multifraction group was -0.4% (63.9% vs 64.3%; [1-sided 95% CI, -6.9 to °]; P value for noninferiority?=?.004) at week 1, -0.7% (66.8% vs 67.6%; [1-sided 95% CI, -8.1 to °]; P value for noninferiority?=?.01) at week 4, and 4.1% (71.8% vs 67.7%; [1-sided 95% CI, -4.6 to °]; P value for noninferiority?=?.002) at week 12. Overall survival rates at 12 weeks were 50% in the single-fraction group vs 55% in the multifraction group (stratified hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.74-1.41]). Of the 11 other secondary end points that were analyzed, the between-group differences were not statistically significant or did not meet noninferiority criterion. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with malignant metastatic solid tumors and spinal canal compression, a single radiotherapy dose, compared with a multifraction dose delivered over 5 days, did not meet the criterion for noninferiority for the primary outcome (ambulatory at 8 weeks). However, the extent to which the lower bound of the CI overlapped with the noninferiority margin should be considered when interpreting the clinical importance of this finding. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Identifiers: ISRCTN97555949 and ISRCTN97108008. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.17913 | en |
dc.title | Effect of single-fraction vs multifraction radiotherapy on ambulatory status among patients with spinal canal compression from metastatic cancer: The SCORAD randomized clinical trial | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.department | Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom | en |
dc.identifier.journal | JAMA | en |
dc.description.note | en] |