• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Breast cancer risk status influences uptake, retention and efficacy of a weight loss programme amongst breast cancer screening attendees: two randomised controlled feasibility trials

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    31795966.pdf
    Size:
    660.7Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    From UNPAYWALL
    Download
    Authors
    Harvie, Michelle N
    Pegington, Mary
    French, D
    Cooper, G
    McDiarmid, S
    Howell, Anthony
    Donnelly, L
    Ruane, H
    Sellers, K
    Foden, P
    Evans, D Gareth R
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT
    Issue Date
    2019
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: Excess body weight and sub-optimal lifestyle are modifiable causes of breast cancer and other diseases. There is little evidence that behaviour change is possible within screening programmes and whether this is influenced by prior knowledge of disease risk. We determined whether breast cancer risk influences uptake, retention and efficacy of a weight control programme in the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme, and whether additional cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes risk information improves uptake and retention further. METHOD: Overweight/obese women in the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme identified at high, moderately increased, average and low-risk of breast cancer were randomised to receive individualised breast cancer risk information (breast cancer prevention programme), or individualised breast cancer, cardiovascular disease (QRISK2) and type 2 diabetes (QDiabetes, HbA1c) information (multiple disease prevention programme). Personalised breast cancer risk feedback was given before randomisation in Study-1, and after randomisation in Study-2. RESULTS: Recruitment was 9% (126/1356) in Study-1 and 7% (52/738) in Study-2. With respect to breast cancer risk, odds ratio of uptake for high/moderately increased vs low risk women was 1.99 (95% CI 1.24-3.17, P?=?0.004) in Study-1 and 3.58 (95% CI 1.59-8.07, P?=?0.002) in Study-2. Odds ratio of retention for high/moderately increased -risk vs. low risk women was 2.98 (95% CI 1.05-8.47, P?=?0.041) in Study-1 and 3.88 (95% CI 1.07-14.04, P?=?0.039) in Study-2. Weight loss of ³5% at 12?months was achieved by 63% high/moderate vs. 43% low-risk women in Study-1 (P?=?0.083) and 39% vs. 8% in Study-2 (P?=?0.008). Uptake, retention and weight loss were equivalent in both the breast cancer prevention programme and the multiple disease prevention programme in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: Women who are informed that they are at increased breast cancer risk were significantly more likely to join and remain in the programmes and consequently lose more weight across both studies. High risk women are more likely engage in a lifetyle prevention programme and also have the greatest potential benefit fom risk reduction strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN91372184 Registered 28 September 2014.
    Citation
    Harvie M, Pegington M, French D, Cooper G, McDiarmid S, Howell A, et al. Breast cancer risk status influences uptake, retention and efficacy of a weight loss programme amongst breast cancer screening attendees: two randomised controlled feasibility trials. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):1089.
    Journal
    BMC Cancer
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/622639
    DOI
    10.1186/s12885-019-6279-8
    PubMed ID
    31795966
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6279-8
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1186/s12885-019-6279-8
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Testing a breast cancer prevention and a multiple disease prevention weight loss programme amongst women within the UK NHS breast screening programme-a randomised feasibility study.
    • Authors: Harvie M, French DP, Pegington M, Cooper G, Howell A, McDiarmid S, Lombardelli C, Donnelly L, Ruane H, Sellers K, Barrett E, Armitage CJ, Evans DG
    • Issue date: 2021 Dec 20
    • Randomised controlled trial of breast cancer and multiple disease prevention weight loss programmes vs written advice amongst women attending a breast cancer family history clinic.
    • Authors: Harvie M, French DP, Pegington M, Lombardelli C, Krizak S, Sellers K, Barrett E, Gareth Evans D, Cutress R, Wilding Rgn A, Graves L, Howell A
    • Issue date: 2023 May
    • Optimisation of the ActWELL lifestyle intervention programme for women attending routine NHS breast screening clinics.
    • Authors: Anderson AS, Craigie AM, Gallant S, McAdam C, Macaskill EJ, McKell J, Mutrie N, O'Carroll RE, Sattar N, Stead M, Treweek S
    • Issue date: 2020 Jun 5
    • BE-WEL trial (breast: evaluation of weight and exercise for lymphoedema) testing weight control and exercise programmes for women with breast cancer related lymphoedema: a feasibility trial.
    • Authors: Harvie M, Livingstone K, McMulllan D, Pegington M, Lombardelli C, Adams J, Farragher M, Barrett E, Bundred N
    • Issue date: 2024 Aug
    • Breast cancer risk reduction--is it feasible to initiate a randomised controlled trial of a lifestyle intervention programme (ActWell) within a national breast screening programme?
    • Authors: Anderson AS, Macleod M, Mutrie N, Sugden J, Dobson H, Treweek S, O'Carroll RE, Thompson A, Kirk A, Brennan G, Wyke S
    • Issue date: 2014 Dec 17
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.