Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLevy, A
dc.contributor.authorHendriks, LEL
dc.contributor.authorBerghmans, T
dc.contributor.authorFaivre-Finn, Corinne
dc.contributor.authorGiaj-Levra, M
dc.contributor.authorGiaj-Levra, N
dc.contributor.authorHasan, B
dc.contributor.authorPochesci, A
dc.contributor.authorGirard, N
dc.contributor.authorGreillier, L
dc.contributor.authorLantuejoul, S
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, J
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, M
dc.contributor.authorReck, M
dc.contributor.authorBesse, B
dc.contributor.authorNovello, S
dc.contributor.authorDingemans, A
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-09T17:08:19Z
dc.date.available2019-12-09T17:08:19Z
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.citationLevy A, Hendriks LEL, Berghmans T, Faivre-Finn C, GiajLevra M, GiajLevra N, et al. EORTC Lung Cancer Group survey on the definition of NSCLC synchronous oligometastatic disease. Eur J Cancer. 2019;122:109-14.en
dc.identifier.pmid31671363en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejca.2019.09.012en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/622562
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Synchronous oligometastatic disease (sOM) has been described as a distinct disease entity; however, there is no consensus on OM definition (OM-d) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A consensus group was formed aiming to agree on a common OM-d that could be used in future clinical trials. A European survey was circulated to generate questions and input for the consensus group meeting. METHODS: A European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group (LCG)/sOM-d consensus group survey was distributed to LCG, sOM-d consensus group, and several European thoracic oncology societies' members. RESULTS: 444 responses were analysed (radiation oncologist: 55% [n = 242], pulmonologist: 15% [n = 66], medical oncologist: 14% [n = 64]). 361 physicians (81%) aimed to cure sOM NSCLC patients and 82% (n = 362) included the possibility of radical intent treatment in their sOM-d. The maximum number of metastases considered in sOM-d varied: 12% replied 1 metastasis, 42% ? 3, and 17% ? 5 metastases. 79% (n = 353) stated that number of organs involved was important for sOM-d, and most (80%, n = 355) considered that only ?3 involved organs (excluding primary) should be included. 317 (72%) included mediastinal lymph node involvement in the sOM-d and 22% (n = 70/317) counted mediastinal lymph node as a metastatic site. Most physicians completed sOM staging with brain magnetic resonance imaging (91%, n = 403) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (98%, n = 437). Pathology proof of metastatic disease was a requirement to define sOM for 315 (71%) physicians. The preferred primary outcome for sOM clinical trials was overall survival (73%, n = 325). CONCLUSION: Although consensual answers were obtained, several issues remain unresolved and will require further research to agree on a sOM-d.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.09.012en
dc.titleEORTC Lung Cancer Group survey on the definition of NSCLC synchronous oligometastatic diseaseen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Institut D'Oncologie Thoracique (IOT), INSERM U1030 Molecular Radiotherapy, Universite Paris-Saclay, F-94805, Villejuif, Franceen
dc.identifier.journalEuropean Journal of Canceren
dc.description.noteen


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record