Validated imaging biomarkers as decision-making tools in clinical trials and routine practice: current status and recommendations from the EIBALL* subcommittee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR)
Name:
13244_2019_Article_764.pdf
Size:
1.092Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Full text, Open Access article
Authors
de Souza, NMAchten, E
Alberich-Bayarri, A
Bamberg, F
Boellaard, R
Clement, O
Fournier, L
Gallagher, F
Golay, X
Heussel, CP
Jackson, EF
Manniesing, R
Mayerhofer, ME
Neri, E
O'Connor, James P B
Oguz, KK
Persson, A
Smits, M
van Beek, EJR
Zech, CJ
Affiliation
Cancer Research UK Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, SurreyIssue Date
q
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Observer-driven pattern recognition is the standard for interpretation of medical images. To achieve global parity in interpretation, semi-quantitative scoring systems have been developed based on observer assessments; these are widely used in scoring coronary artery disease, the arthritides and neurological conditions and for indicating the likelihood of malignancy. However, in an era of machine learning and artificial intelligence, it is increasingly desirable that we extract quantitative biomarkers from medical images that inform on disease detection, characterisation, monitoring and assessment of response to treatment. Quantitation has the potential to provide objective decision-support tools in the management pathway of patients. Despite this, the quantitative potential of imaging remains under-exploited because of variability of the measurement, lack of harmonised systems for data acquisition and analysis, and crucially, a paucity of evidence on how such quantitation potentially affects clinical decision-making and patient outcome. This article reviews the current evidence for the use of semi-quantitative and quantitative biomarkers in clinical settings at various stages of the disease pathway including diagnosis, staging and prognosis, as well as predicting and detecting treatment response. It critically appraises current practice and sets out recommendations for using imaging objectively to drive patient management decisions.Citation
deSouza NM, Achten E, Alberich-Bayarri A, Bamberg F, Boellaard R, Clement O, et al. Validated imaging biomarkers as decision-making tools in clinical trials and routine practice: current status and recommendations from the EIBALL* subcommittee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging. 2019 Aug 29;10(1):87.Journal
Insights in ImagingDOI
10.1186/s13244-019-0764-0PubMed ID
31468205Additional Links
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0764-0Type
ArticleLanguage
enae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/s13244-019-0764-0
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
- Authors: Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W
- Issue date: 2020 Nov
- Standardised lesion segmentation for imaging biomarker quantitation: a consensus recommendation from ESR and EORTC.
- Authors: deSouza NM, van der Lugt A, Deroose CM, Alberich-Bayarri A, Bidaut L, Fournier L, Costaridou L, Oprea-Lager DE, Kotter E, Smits M, Mayerhoefer ME, Boellaard R, Caroli A, de Geus-Oei LF, Kunz WG, Oei EH, Lecouvet F, Franca M, Loewe C, Lopci E, Caramella C, Persson A, Golay X, Dewey M, O'Connor JPB, deGraaf P, Gatidis S, Zahlmann G, European Society of Radiology, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer
- Issue date: 2022 Oct 4
- MRI biomarkers in neuro-oncology.
- Authors: Smits M
- Issue date: 2021 Aug
- Artificial Intelligence in Oncological Hybrid Imaging.
- Authors: Feuerecker B, Heimer MM, Geyer T, Fabritius MP, Gu S, Schachtner B, Beyer L, Ricke J, Gatidis S, Ingrisch M, Cyran CC
- Issue date: 2023 Oct
- Machine Learning in Medical Imaging.
- Authors: Giger ML
- Issue date: 2018 Mar