A phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of the dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor vistusertib in relapsed, refractory DLBCL
dc.contributor.author | Eyre, TA | |
dc.contributor.author | Hildyard, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Hamblin, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Ali, AS | |
dc.contributor.author | Houlton, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Hopkins, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Royston, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Linton, Kim M | |
dc.contributor.author | Pettitt, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Rule, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Cwynarski, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Barrington, SF | |
dc.contributor.author | Warbey, V | |
dc.contributor.author | Wrench, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Barrans, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Hirst, CS | |
dc.contributor.author | Panchal, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Roudier, MP | |
dc.contributor.author | Harrington, EA | |
dc.contributor.author | Davies, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Collins, GP | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-07T15:16:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-07T15:16:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Eyre TA, Hildyard C, Hamblin A, Ali AS, Houlton A, Hopkins L, et al. A phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of the dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor vistusertib in relapsed, refractory DLBCL. Hematol Oncol. 2019 Aug 5. | en |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31385336 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/hon.2662 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10541/622205 | |
dc.description.abstract | Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are unfit for or relapsed postautologous stem-cell transplantation have poor outcomes. Historically, mTORC1 inhibitors have produced responses in approximately 30% of patients in this setting. mTORC1 inhibitor efficacy may be limited by resistance mechanisms including AKT activation by mTORC2. To date, dual mTORC1/2 inhibitors targeting both the TORC1 and TORC2 complexes have not been investigated in DLBCL. This phase II trial investigated the oral dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor vistusertib in an intermittent dosing schedule of 125 mg b.d. for 2 days per week. Thirty patients received vistusertib and six received vistusertib-rituximab for up to six cycles (28-day cycles). Two partial responses were achieved on monotherapy. Durations of response were 57 and 62 days, respectively, for these patients. 19% had stable disease within six cycles. In the monotherapy arm, the median progression-free survival was1.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61-2.14) months and median overall survival was 6.58 (95% CI 3.81-not reached) months, respectively. The median duration of response or stable disease across the trial duration was 153 days (95% CI 112-not reached). Tumour responses according to positron emission tomography/computed tomography versus computed tomography were concordant. There were no differences noted in tumour volume response according to cell of origin by either gene expression profiling or immunohistochemistry. Vistusertib ± rituximab was well tolerated; across 36 patients 86% of adverse events were grade (G) 1-2. Common vistusertib-related adverse events were similar to those described with mTORC1 inhibitors: nausea (47% G1-2), diarrhoea (27% G1-2, 6% G3), fatigue (30% G1-2, 3% G3), mucositis (25% G1-2, 6% G3), vomiting (17% G1-2), and dyspepsia (14% G1-2). Dual mTORC1/2 inhibitors do not clearly confer an advantage over mTORC1 inhibitors in relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Potential resistance mechanisms are discussed within. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hon.2662 | en |
dc.title | A phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of the dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor vistusertib in relapsed, refractory DLBCL | en |
dc.type | Meetings and Proceedings | en |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, Oxford | en |
dc.identifier.journal | Hematological Oncology | en |
dc.description.note | en] |