Quality optimisation in colonoscopy: a function of time of colonoscopy or bowel preparation
AffiliationHairmyres Hospital, General Surgery, Colorectal Department, Glasgow, United Kingdom
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractTo test the hypothesis claimed in recent studies that quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy could be influenced by the time of the day colonoscopy is performed. Do patients in morning list have better bowel preparation than those on the afternoon list? Retrospective analysis of 736 consecutive patients who had colonoscopy from 1(st) August to 31(st) December 2012. Patients with poor bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Prep Score 6 or less) were identified (n = 242). Colonoscopy reports of these patients analysed. Patients were stratified into two groups (am and pm) and results compared. Mean patient age 63.9 years (range 19-89). Male to female ratio 1:1. 92% of patients were given Moviprep. for bowel preparation. 32.9% (242/736) of patients were identified as having inadequate bowel preparation. 37.7% of morning list patients had poor bowel preparatioN 26.7% of afternoon list patients had poor bowel preparatioN 14.7% (108/736) had incomplete colonoscopy, of which 26.9% (29/108) were due to poor bowel preparation. The commonest reasons for incomplete examination were patient discomfort & bowel looping. Our study demonstrates that morning session patients had poorer bowel preparation than the afternoon session patients in contrast to published evidence in recent literature. This implies that timing of bowel preparation is probably more important than timing of colonoscopy. Poor bowel preparation does not seem to have a significant impact on the colonoscopy failure rate in this series.
CitationAbudeeb H, Khan K, Maung M, Malcomson L, Brown A. Quality optimisation in colonoscopy: a function of time of colonoscopy or bowel preparation. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;32:205.
JournalPan African Medical Journal, The
- The timing of bowel preparation is more important than the timing of colonoscopy in determining the quality of bowel cleansing.
- Authors: Eun CS, Han DS, Hyun YS, Bae JH, Park HS, Kim TY, Jeon YC, Sohn JH
- Issue date: 2011 Feb
- Does 2-L Split-Dose Polyethylene Glycol Bowel Preparation Improve the Quality of Screening Colonoscopy?
- Authors: Chen J, Athilingam P, Brady P
- Issue date: 2018 Sep/Oct
- Colonoscopic enema as rescue for inadequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a prospective, observational study.
- Authors: Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Kato N, Kamijima T, Ichise Y, Tanaka N
- Issue date: 2012 Oct
- A prospective audit of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-volume polyethylene glycol (2 L) versus standard volume polyethylene glycol (4 L) versus magnesium citrate plus stimulant laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
- Authors: Kelly NM, Rodgers C, Patterson N, Jacob SG, Mainie I
- Issue date: 2012 Aug
- Predictors of Suboptimal Bowel Preparation Using 3-l of Polyethylene Glycol for an Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study.
- Authors: Cheng CL, Liu NJ, Tang JH, Kuo YL, Hung HL, Tsui YN, Lee BP, Lin CH
- Issue date: 2017 Feb