Cosmetic assessment in brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy) for breast cancer: a multidisciplinary review
AffiliationFondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractPURPOSE: This review was to focus on breast brachytherapy cosmetic assessment methods state of the art and to define the advantages and disadvantages related to. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a literature review of the major experience on breast brachytherapy cosmetic assessment methods in several databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases). To identify the relevant works, a task force screened citations at title and abstract level to identify potentially relevant paper. An expert board reviewed and approved the text. The assessment systems were classified into three main groups: (1) the Oncological Toxicity Scales, (2) the Independent Patients Perspective Measures, (3) the Patient-Related Outcome Measures. Each cosmetic assessment method was evaluated following six parameters: (1) anatomical site, (2) advantages, (3) disadvantages, (4) subjective/objective, (5) quantitative/qualitative, (6) computers or pictures needs. RESULTS: Eleven assessment methods were selected. Three methods were classified as Oncological Toxicity Scale, six in the Independent Patients Perspective Measures classification, and two as Patient-Related Outcome Measures. Six methods are subjective, while eight are objective. Four systems are classified as quantitative, four as qualitative while three both. Five systems need informatics support. Moreover, each method was discussed individually reporting the main characteristics and peculiarities. CONCLUSIONS: Cosmesis is one major end point for the patient who has a malignancy of low lethal potential. In modern personalized medicine, there is a need for standardized cosmetic outcome assessments to analyze and compare the results of treatments. No gold standard methods currently exist. The result of this review is to summarize the various cosmesis methods, defining the strengths and weaknesses of each one and giving a line in research and clinical practice.
CitationTagliaferri L, Lancellotta V, Zinicola T, Gentileschi S, Sollena P, Garganese G, et al. Cosmetic assessment in brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy) for breast cancer: a multidisciplinary review. Brachytherapy. 2019.
- Proposal for a gold standard for cosmetic evaluation after breast conserving therapy: Results from the St George and Wollongong Breast Boost trial.
- Authors: Merie R, Browne L, Cardoso JS, Cardoso MJ, Chin Y, Clark C, Graham P, Szwajcer A, Hau E
- Issue date: 2017 Dec
- New objective method in reporting the breast cosmesis after breast-conservative treatment based on nonstandardized photographs: The Objective Breast Cosmesis Scale.
- Authors: Soror T, Kovács G, Kovács Á, Seibold N, Melchert C, Baumann K, Wenzel E, Stojanovic-Rundic S
- Issue date: 2016 Sep-Oct
- First analysis of patient demographics, technical reproducibility, cosmesis, and early toxicity: results of the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite breast brachytherapy trial.
- Authors: Vicini FA, Beitsch PD, Quiet CA, Keleher A, Garcia D, Snider HC, Gittleman MA, Zannis VJ, Kuerer H, Whitacre EB, Whitworth PW, Fine RE, Haffty BG, Arrambide LS
- Issue date: 2005 Sep 15
- Accelerated partial breast irradiation with low-dose-rate interstitial implant brachytherapy after wide local excision: 12-year outcomes from a prospective trial.
- Authors: Hattangadi JA, Powell SN, MacDonald SM, Mauceri T, Ancukiewicz M, Freer P, Lawenda B, Alm El-Din MA, Gadd MA, Smith BL, Taghian AG
- Issue date: 2012 Jul 1
- Factors associated with optimal long-term cosmetic results in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation using balloon-based brachytherapy.
- Authors: Vicini FA, Keisch M, Shah C, Goyal S, Khan AJ, Beitsch PD, Lyden M, Haffty BG
- Issue date: 2012 Jun 1