• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    s13063-019-3216-8.pdf
    Size:
    3.103Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Full text, Open Access
    Download
    Authors
    Schiavone, F
    Bathia, R
    Letchemanan, K
    Masters, L
    Amos, C
    Bara, A
    Brown, L
    Gilson, C
    Pugh, C
    Atako, N
    Hudson, F
    Parmar, M
    Langley, R
    Kaplan, R
    Parker, C
    Attard, G
    Clarke, Noel W
    Gillessen, Silke
    James, N
    Maughan, T
    Sydes, M
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK
    Issue Date
    2019
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: There are limited research and literature on the trial management challenges encountered in running adaptive platform trials. This trial design allows both (1) the seamless addition of new research comparisons when compelling clinical and scientific research questions emerge, and (2) early stopping of accrual to individual comparisons that do not show sufficient activity without affecting other active comparisons. Adaptive platform design trials also offer many potential benefits over traditional trials, from faster time to accrual to contemporaneously recruiting multiple research comparisons, added flexibility to focus on more promising research comparisons via pre-planned interim analyses and potentially shorter time to primary results. We share here our experiences from a trial management perspective, highlighting the challenges and successes. METHODS: We evaluated the operational aspects of making changes to these adaptive platform trials and identified both common and trial-specific challenges. The operational steps and challenges linked to both the addition of new research comparisons and stopping recruitment following pre-planned interim analysis were considered in our evaluation. RESULTS: Specific operational challenges in these adaptive platform protocols, additional to those in traditional two-arm trials, were identified. Key lessons are presented describing some of the solutions and considerations over conducting these trials. Careful consideration on the practicality of the protocol structure (modular versus single protocol), the longevity and continuity of trial oversight committees, and having clear clinical and scientific criteria for the addition of new research comparisons were identified as some of the most common challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the operational complexities associated with running adaptive platform protocols is paramount for their conduct, adaptive platform trials offer an efficient model to run randomised controlled trials and we are continuing to work to reduce further the effort required from an operational perspective.
    Citation
    Schiavone F, Bathia R, Letchemanan K, Masters L, Amos C, Bara A, et al. This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols. Trials. 2019;20(1):264.
    Journal
    Trials
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/621925
    DOI
    10.1186/s13063-019-3216-8
    PubMed ID
    31138317
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3216-8
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1186/s13063-019-3216-8
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Changing platforms without stopping the train: experiences of data management and data management systems when adapting platform protocols by adding and closing comparisons.
    • Authors: Hague D, Townsend S, Masters L, Rauchenberger M, Van Looy N, Diaz-Montana C, Gannon M, James N, Maughan T, Parmar MKB, Brown L, Sydes MR, STAMPEDE and FOCUS4 investigators
    • Issue date: 2019 May 29
    • A platform trial in practice: adding a new experimental research arm to the ongoing confirmatory FLAIR trial in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
    • Authors: Howard DR, Hockaday A, Brown JM, Gregory WM, Todd S, Munir T, Oughton JB, Dimbleby C, Hillmen P
    • Issue date: 2021 Jan 8
    • Flexible trial design in practice - stopping arms for lack-of-benefit and adding research arms mid-trial in STAMPEDE: a multi-arm multi-stage randomized controlled trial.
    • Authors: Sydes MR, Parmar MK, Mason MD, Clarke NW, Amos C, Anderson J, de Bono J, Dearnaley DP, Dwyer J, Green C, Jovic G, Ritchie AW, Russell JM, Sanders K, Thalmann G, James ND
    • Issue date: 2012 Sep 15
    • Experiences of running a stratified medicine adaptive platform trial: Challenges and lessons learned from 10 years of the FOCUS4 trial in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    • Authors: Brown LC, Graham J, Fisher D, Adams R, Seligmann J, Seymour M, Kaplan R, Yates E, Parmar M, Richman SD, Quirke P, Butler R, Shiu K, Middleton G, Samuel L, Wilson RH, Maughan TS, FOCUS4 Trial Investigators
    • Issue date: 2022 Apr
    • Practical guidance for running late-phase platform protocols for clinical trials: lessons from experienced UK clinical trials units.
    • Authors: Love SB, Cafferty F, Snowdon C, Carty K, Savage J, Pallmann P, McParland L, Brown L, Masters L, Schiavone F, Hague D, Townsend S, Amos C, South A, Sturgeon K, Langley R, Maughan T, James N, Hall E, Kernaghan S, Bliss J, Turner N, Tutt A, Yap C, Firth C, Kong A, Mehanna H, Watts C, Hills R, Thomas I, Copland M, Bell S, Sebag-Montefiore D, Jones R, Parmar MKB, Sydes MR
    • Issue date: 2022 Sep 6
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.