• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Positron emission tomography score has greater prognostic significance than pretreatment risk stratification in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma in the UK RAPID study

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Barrington, S
    Phillips, E
    Counsell, N
    Hancock, B
    Pettengell, R
    Johnson, P
    Townsend, W
    Culligan, D
    Popova, B
    Clifton-Hadley, L
    McMillan, A
    Hoskin, Peter J
    O'Doherty, M
    Illidge, Timothy M
    Radford, John A
    Affiliation
    King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, Kings College London, King's Health Partners, London
    Issue Date
    2019
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    PURPOSE: Accurate stratification of patients is an important goal in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), but the role of pretreatment clinical risk stratification in the context of positron emission tomography (PET) -adapted treatment is unclear. We performed a subsidiary analysis of the RAPID trial to assess the prognostic value of pretreatment risk factors and PET score in determining outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IA to IIA HL and no mediastinal bulk underwent PET assessment after three cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine; 143 PET-positive patients (PET score, 3 to 5) received a fourth doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine cycle and involved-field radiotherapy, and 419 patients in complete metabolic remission were randomly assigned to receive involved-field radiotherapy (n = 208) or no additional treatment (n = 211). Cox regression was used to investigate the association between PET score and pretreatment risk factors with HL-specific event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS: High PET score was associated with inferior EFS, before (P < .001) and after adjustment (P = .01) for baseline risk stratification. Only patients with a postchemotherapy PET score of 5 (uptake ? three times maximum liver uptake) had an increased risk of progression or HL-related death (hazard ratio, 9.4 v score of 3; 95% CI, 2.8 to 31.3 and hazard ratio, 6.7 v score of 4; 95% CI, 1.4 to 31.7). Patients with a PET score of 5 also had inferior progression-free and overall survival. There was no association between European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer or German Hodgkin Study Group risk group and EFS, before or after adjusting for PET score (all P > .4). CONCLUSION: In RAPID, a positive PET scan did not carry uniform prognostic weight; only a PET score of 5 was associated with inferior outcomes. This suggests that in future trials involving patients without B symptoms or mediastinal bulk, a score of 5 rather than a positive PET result should be used to guide treatment escalation in early-stage HL.
    Citation
    Barrington SF, Phillips EH, Counsell N, Hancock B, Pettengell R, Johnson P, et al. Positron emission tomography score has greater prognostic significance than pretreatment risk stratification in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma in the UK RAPID study. J Clin Oncol. 2019.
    Journal
    Journal of Clincal Oncology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/621894
    DOI
    10.1200/JCO.18.01799
    PubMed ID
    31112475
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01799
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1200/JCO.18.01799
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Eight Cycles of ABVD Versus Four Cycles of BEACOPPescalated Plus Four Cycles of BEACOPPbaseline in Stage III to IV, International Prognostic Score ≥ 3, High-Risk Hodgkin Lymphoma: First Results of the Phase III EORTC 20012 Intergroup Trial.
    • Authors: Carde P, Karrasch M, Fortpied C, Brice P, Khaled H, Casasnovas O, Caillot D, Gaillard I, Bologna S, Ferme C, Lugtenburg PJ, Morschhauser F, Aurer I, Coiffier B, Meyer R, Seftel M, Wolf M, Glimelius B, Sureda A, Mounier N
    • Issue date: 2016 Jun 10
    • Modification of initial therapy in early and advanced Hodgkin lymphoma, based on interim PET/CT is beneficial: a prospective multicentre trial of 355 patients.
    • Authors: Dann EJ, Bairey O, Bar-Shalom R, Mashiach T, Barzilai E, Kornberg A, Akria L, Tadmor T, Filanovsky K, Abadi U, Kagna O, Ruchlemer R, Abdah-Bortnyak R, Goldschmidt N, Epelbaum R, Horowitz NA, Lavie D, Ben-Yehuda D, Shpilberg O, Paltiel O
    • Issue date: 2017 Sep
    • 18F-FDG PET after 2 cycles of ABVD predicts event-free survival in early and advanced Hodgkin lymphoma.
    • Authors: Cerci JJ, Pracchia LF, Linardi CC, Pitella FA, Delbeke D, Izaki M, Trindade E, Soares J Jr, Buccheri V, Meneghetti JC
    • Issue date: 2010 Sep
    • Positron emission tomography-adapted therapy for first-line treatment in individuals with Hodgkin lymphoma.
    • Authors: Sickinger MT, von Tresckow B, Kobe C, Engert A, Borchmann P, Skoetz N
    • Issue date: 2015 Jan 9
    • Results of a trial of PET-directed therapy for early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    • Authors: Radford J, Illidge T, Counsell N, Hancock B, Pettengell R, Johnson P, Wimperis J, Culligan D, Popova B, Smith P, McMillan A, Brownell A, Kruger A, Lister A, Hoskin P, O'Doherty M, Barrington S
    • Issue date: 2015 Apr 23
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2019)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.