AffiliationDivision of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Princess Margaret Hospital and University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBackground: Constitutional loss of function (LOF) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in pattern recognition receptors FPR1, TLR3, and TLR4 have previously been reported to predict oxaliplatin benefit in colorectal cancer. Confirmation of this association could substantially improve patient stratification. Methods: We performed a retrospective biomarker analysis of the Short Course in Oncology Therapy (SCOT) and COIN/COIN-B trials. Participant status for LOF variants in FPR1 (rs867228), TLR3 (rs3775291), and TLR4 (rs4986790/rs4986791) was determined by genotyping array or genotype imputation. Associations between LOF variants and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Cox regression, adjusted for confounders, using additive, dominant, and recessive genetic models. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Our validation study populations included 2929 and 1948 patients in the SCOT and COIN/COIN-B cohorts, respectively, of whom 2728 and 1672 patients had functional status of all three SNPs determined. We found no evidence of an association between any SNP and DFS in the SCOT cohort, or with OS in either cohort, irrespective of the type of model used. This included models for which an association was previously reported for rs867228 (recessive model, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for DFS in SCOT?=?1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]?=?0.99 to 1.45, P?=?.07; HR for OS in COIN/COIN-B?=?0.92, 95% CI?=?0.63 to 1.34, P?=?.66), and rs4986790 (dominant model, multivariable-adjusted HR for DFS in SCOT?=?0.86, 95% CI?=?0.65 to 1.13, P?=?.27; HR for OS in COIN/COIN-B?=?1.08, 95% CI?=?0.90 to 1.31, P?=?.40). Conclusion: In this prespecified analysis of two large clinical trials, we found no evidence that constitutional LOF SNPs in FPR1, TLR3, or TLR4 are associated with differential benefit from oxaliplatin. Our results suggest these SNPs are unlikely to be clinically useful biomarkers.
CitationChadi SA, Beets GL, Perez RO, Renehan AG. Watch-and-wait strategy in rectal cancer - authors' reply. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;4(2):97.
JournalThe Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Watch-and-wait approach for rectal cancer: concepts of a subject-specific method - Authors' reply.
- Authors: Dossa F, Baxter NN
- Issue date: 2017 Sep
- Watch-and-wait versus surgical resection for patients with rectal cancer - Authors' reply.
- Authors: Renehan AG, Malcomson L, Emsley R, Scott N, O'Dwyer ST, OnCoRe project investigators.
- Issue date: 2016 Apr
- Rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, surgery, or "watch and wait".
- Authors: Lai CL, Lai MJ, Wu CC, Jao SW, Hsiao CW
- Issue date: 2016 Feb
- Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis.
- Authors: Renehan AG, Malcomson L, Emsley R, Gollins S, Maw A, Myint AS, Rooney PS, Susnerwala S, Blower A, Saunders MP, Wilson MS, Scott N, O'Dwyer ST
- Issue date: 2016 Feb
- A watch-and-wait approach to the management of rectal cancer.
- Authors: Das P, Minsky BD
- Issue date: 2013 Oct