Authors
Rueegg, CSStenehjem, JS
Egger, M
Ghiasvand, R
Cho, E
Lund, E
Weiderpass, E
Green, Adèle C
Veierod, MB
Affiliation
Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, NorwayIssue Date
2018
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Whether sunscreen use affects melanoma risk has been widely studied with contradictory results. To answer this question we performed a systematic review of all published studies, accounting for sources of heterogeneity and bias. We searched for original articles investigating the sunscreen-melanoma association in humans to 28.02.2018. We then used random-effects meta-analysis to combine estimates of the association, stratified by study design. Stratified meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to identify sources of heterogeneity. We included 21'069 melanoma cases from 28 studies published 1979-2018: 23 case-control (11 hospital-based, 12 population-based), 1 ecological, 3 cohort and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT). There was marked heterogeneity across study designs and among case-control studies but adjustment for confounding by sun exposure, sunburns and phenotype systematically moved estimates towards decreased melanoma risk amongst sunscreen users. Ever- vs. never-use of sunscreen was inversely associated with melanoma in hospital-based case-control studies (adjusted odds ratio (OR)=0.57, 95%confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.87, pheterogeneity <0.001), the ecological study (rate ratio=0.48, 95%CI 0.35-0.66), and the RCT (hazard ratio (HR)=0.49, 95%CI 0.24-1.01). It was not associated in population-based case-control studies (OR=1.17, 95%CI 0.90-1.51, pheterogeneity <0.001) and was positively associated in the cohort studies (HR=1.27, 95%CI 1.07-1.51, pheterogeneity =0.236). The association differed by latitude (pinteraction =0.042), region (pinteraction =0.008), adjustment for naevi/freckling (pinteraction =0.035), and proportion of never-sunscreen-users (pinteraction =0·012). Evidence from observational studies on sunscreen use and melanoma risk was weak and heterogeneous, consistent with the challenges of controlling for innate confounding by indication. The only RCT showed a protective effect of sunscreen. KEYWORDS: Sunscreen; melanoma; meta-analysis; skin cancer; sun protectionCitation
Rueegg CS, Stenehjem JS, Egger M, Ghiasvand R, Cho E, Lund E, et al. Challenges in assessing the sunscreen - Melanoma Association. Int J Cancer. 2018 Nov 16.Journal
Int J CancerDOI
10.1002/ijc.31997PubMed ID
30447006Additional Links
https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31997Type
ArticleLanguage
enae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/ijc.31997
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Phenotypic markers, sunlight-related factors and sunscreen use in patients with cutaneous melanoma: an Austrian case-control study.
- Authors: Wolf P, Quehenberger F, Müllegger R, Stranz B, Kerl H
- Issue date: 1998 Aug
- Use of sunscreen and risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Authors: Silva ESD, Tavares R, Paulitsch FDS, Zhang L
- Issue date: 2018 Apr 1
- Melanoma risk in relation to use of sunscreen or other sun protection methods.
- Authors: Lazovich D, Vogel RI, Berwick M, Weinstock MA, Warshaw EM, Anderson KE
- Issue date: 2011 Dec
- Cutaneous malignant melanoma, sun exposure, and sunscreen use: epidemiological evidence.
- Authors: Bastuji-Garin S, Diepgen TL
- Issue date: 2002 Apr
- Melanoma and sunscreen use: need for studies representative of actual behaviours.
- Authors: Autier P, Doré JF, Renard F, Luther H, Cattaruzza MS, Gefeller O, Grivegnée A
- Issue date: 1997 Aug