Assessing MR-linac radiotherapy robustness for anatomical changes in head and neck cancer.
Authors
Chuter, RobertPollitt, Andrew
Whitehurst, Philip
Mackay, Ranald I
van Herk, Marcel
McWilliam, Alan
Affiliation
Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, ManchesterIssue Date
2018-06-20
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The MR-Linac will provide excellent soft tissue contrast for on-treatment imaging. It is well known that the electron return effect (ERE) results in areas of increased and decreased dose at air/tissue boundaries, which can be compensated for in plan optimisation. However, anatomical changes may affect the quality of this compensation. In this paper we aim to quantify the interaction of anatomical changes with ERE in head and neck (H&N) cancer patients. Twenty patients treated with either 66 Gy or 60 Gy in 30 fractions were selected. Ten had significant weight-loss during treatment requiring repeat CT (rCT) and ten had PTVs close to the sinus cavity. Plans were optimised using Monaco to meet the departmental dose constraints and copied to the rCT and re-calculated. For the sinus patients, we optimised plans with full and empty sinus at both 0 T and 1.5 T. The effect of the opposite filling state was next evaluated. No clinically relevant difference between the doses in the PTV and OARs were observed related to weight-loss in 0 T or 1.5 T fields. Variable sinus filling caused greater dosimetric differences near the walls of the sinus for plans optimised with a full cavity in 1.5 T, indicating that optimising with an empty sinus makes the plan more robust to changes in filling. These findings indicate that current off-line strategies for adaptive planning for H&N patients are also valid on an MR-linac, if care is taken with sinus filling.Citation
Assessing MR-linac radiotherapy robustness for anatomical changes in head and neck cancer. 2018, 63(12): 125020 Phys Med BiolJournal
Physics in Medicine and BiologyDOI
10.1088/1361-6560/aac749PubMed ID
29790861Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1361-6560ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1088/1361-6560/aac749
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- The impact of margin reduction on radiation dose distribution of ultra-hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy utilizing a 1.5-T MR-Linac.
- Authors: Onal C, Efe E, Bozca R, Yavas C, Yavas G, Arslan G
- Issue date: 2024 Jan
- A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.
- Authors: Leung WS, Wu VWC, Liu CYW, Cheng ACK
- Issue date: 2019 Nov
- An evaluation of adaptive planning by assessing the dosimetric impact of weight loss throughout the course of radiotherapy in bilateral treatment of head and neck cancer patients.
- Authors: Stauch Z, Zoller W, Tedrick K, Walston S, Christ D, Hunzeker A, Lenards N, Culp L, Gamez ME, Blakaj D
- Issue date: 2020 Spring
- Relative plan robustness of step-and-shoot vs rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy on repeat computed tomographic simulation for weight loss in head and neck cancer.
- Authors: Thomson DJ, Beasley WJ, Garcez K, Lee LW, Sykes AJ, Rowbottom CG, Slevin NJ
- Issue date: 2016 Summer
- Study of volumetric and dosimetric changes during fractionated radiotherapy in head and neck cancers: A single centre experience.
- Authors: Kumar V, Nautiyal V, Kant R, Gupta M, Bansal S, Ahmad M
- Issue date: 2021 Jan-Mar