A robust optimisation approach accounting for the effect of fractionation on setup uncertainties.
AffiliationFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractProton plans are subject to a number of uncertainties which must be accounted for to ensure that they are delivered safely. Misalignment resulting from residual errors in daily patient positioning can result in both a displacement and distortion of dose distributions. This can be particularly important for intensity modulated proton therapy treatments where the accurate alignment of highly modulated fields may be required to deliver the intended treatment. A number of methods to generate plans that are robust to these uncertainties exist. These include robust optimisation approaches which account for the effect of uncertainties on the dose distribution within the optimisation process. However, robustness to uncertainty comes at the cost of plan quality. For this reason, it is important that the uncertainties considered are realistic. Existing approaches to robust optimisation have neglected the role of fractionated treatment deliveries in reducing the uncertainties that result from random setup errors. Here, a method of robust optimisation which accounts for this effect is presented and is evaluated using a 2D planning environment. The optimisation algorithm considers the dose in the estimated upper and lower bounds of the dose distribution under the effect of setup and range errors. A comparison with plans robustly optimised without consideration of the effect of fractionation and conventionally optimised plans is presented. Fractionation incorporated robust optimisation demonstrates a reduced sensitivity to uncertainty compared to conventionally optimised plans and a reduced integral dose compared to robustly optimised plans.
CitationA robust optimisation approach accounting for the effect of fractionation on setup uncertainties. 2017, 62(20): 8178-8196 Phys Med Biol
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
- Incorporating the effect of fractionation in the evaluation of proton plan robustness to setup errors.
- Authors: Lowe M, Albertini F, Aitkenhead A, Lomax AJ, MacKay RI
- Issue date: 2016 Jan 7
- Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
- Authors: Stützer K, Lin A, Kirk M, Lin L
- Issue date: 2017 Nov 1
- Limited Impact of Setup and Range Uncertainties, Breathing Motion, and Interplay Effects in Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
- Authors: Inoue T, Widder J, van Dijk LV, Takegawa H, Koizumi M, Takashina M, Usui K, Kurokawa C, Sugimoto S, Saito AI, Sasai K, Van't Veld AA, Langendijk JA, Korevaar EW
- Issue date: 2016 Nov 1
- Shortening delivery times of intensity modulated proton therapy by reducing proton energy layers during treatment plan optimization.
- Authors: van de Water S, Kooy HM, Heijmen BJ, Hoogeman MS
- Issue date: 2015 Jun 1
- Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
- Authors: Liu W, Frank SJ, Li X, Li Y, Park PC, Dong L, Ronald Zhu X, Mohan R
- Issue date: 2013 May