Gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment in previously untreated advanced unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas (GeDDiS): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial.
dc.contributor.author | Seddon, B | |
dc.contributor.author | Strauss, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Whelan, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Leahy, Michael G | |
dc.contributor.author | Woll, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Cowie, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Rothermundt, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Wood, Z | |
dc.contributor.author | Benson, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Ali, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Marples, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Veal, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Jamieson, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Küver, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Tirabosco, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Forsyth, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Nash, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Dehbi, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Beare, S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-23T19:47:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-10-23T19:47:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment in previously untreated advanced unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas (GeDDiS): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. 2017, 18 (10):1397-1410 Lancet Oncol | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1474-5488 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 28882536 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30622-8 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10541/620621 | |
dc.description.abstract | For many years, first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma has been doxorubicin. This study compared gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.rights | Archived with thanks to The Lancet. Oncology | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | |
dc.subject.mesh | Confidence Intervals | |
dc.subject.mesh | Deoxycytidine | |
dc.subject.mesh | Disease-Free Survival | |
dc.subject.mesh | Dose-Response Relationship, Drug | |
dc.subject.mesh | Doxorubicin | |
dc.subject.mesh | Drug Administration Schedule | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Infusions, Intravenous | |
dc.subject.mesh | Kaplan-Meier Estimate | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Neoplasm Invasiveness | |
dc.subject.mesh | Neoplasm Metastasis | |
dc.subject.mesh | Neoplasm Staging | |
dc.subject.mesh | Prognosis | |
dc.subject.mesh | Sarcoma | |
dc.subject.mesh | Soft Tissue Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Survival Analysis | |
dc.subject.mesh | Taxoids | |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | |
dc.subject.mesh | United Kingdom | |
dc.title | Gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment in previously untreated advanced unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas (GeDDiS): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.department | University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. | en |
dc.identifier.journal | The Lancet Oncology | en |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-12-17T15:05:25Z | |
html.description.abstract | For many years, first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma has been doxorubicin. This study compared gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. |