• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    A randomised trial of screening with digital breast tomosynthesis plus conventional digital 2D mammography versus 2D mammography alone in younger higher risk women.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    559658.pdf
    Size:
    354.3Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    From UNPAYWALL
    Download
    Authors
    Maxwell, Anthony J
    Michell, M
    Lim, Y
    Astley, S
    Wilson, M
    Hurley, E
    Evans, D
    Howell, Anthony
    Iqbal, A
    Kotre, John C
    Duffy, S
    Morris, J
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    Nightingale Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, M23 9LT
    Issue Date
    2017-06-30
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has been shown to increase invasive cancer detection rates at screening compared to full field digital (2D) mammography alone, and some studies have reported a reduction in the screening recall rate. No prospective randomised studies of DBT have previously been published. This study compares recall rates with 2D mammography with and without concurrent DBT in women in their forties with a family history of breast cancer undergoing incident screening.
    Citation
    A randomised trial of screening with digital breast tomosynthesis plus conventional digital 2D mammography versus 2D mammography alone in younger higher risk women. 2017 Eur J Radiol
    Journal
    European Journal of Radiology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/620490
    DOI
    10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.06.018
    PubMed ID
    28716454
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    1872-7727
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.06.018
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Authors: Movik E, Dalsbø TK, Fagelund BC, Friberg EG, Håheim LL, Skår Å
    • Issue date: 2017 Sep 4
    • Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
    • Authors: Caumo F, Zorzi M, Brunelli S, Romanucci G, Rella R, Cugola L, Bricolo P, Fedato C, Montemezzi S, Houssami N
    • Issue date: 2018 Apr
    • Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    • Authors: Greenberg JS, Javitt MC, Katzen J, Michael S, Holland AE
    • Issue date: 2014 Sep
    • Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.
    • Authors: Pattacini P, Nitrosi A, Giorgi Rossi P, Iotti V, Ginocchi V, Ravaioli S, Vacondio R, Braglia L, Cavuto S, Campari C, RETomo Working Group
    • Issue date: 2018 Aug
    • The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.
    • Authors: Gilbert FJ, Tucker L, Gillan MG, Willsher P, Cooke J, Duncan KA, Michell MJ, Dobson HM, Lim YY, Purushothaman H, Strudley C, Astley SM, Morrish O, Young KC, Duffy SW
    • Issue date: 2015 Jan
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.