• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Re: Nicola Fossati, Peter-Paul M. Willemse, Thomas Van den Broeck, et al. The benefits and harms of different extents of lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. In Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.003: Lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy: science or pseudoscience?

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Clarke, Noel W
    Affiliation
    The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK.
    Issue Date
    2017-06-01
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Re: Nicola Fossati, Peter-Paul M. Willemse, Thomas Van den Broeck, et al. The benefits and harms of different extents of lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. In Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.003: Lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy: science or pseudoscience? 2017 Eur. Urol.
    Journal
    European Urology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/620461
    DOI
    10.1016/j.eururo.2017.05.020
    PubMed ID
    28579297
    Type
    Other
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    1873-7560
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.eururo.2017.05.020
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Reply to Vérane Achard, Alan Dal Pra, and Thomas Zilli's Letter to the Editor re: Carlo A. Bravi, Nicola Fossati, Giorgio Gandaglia, et al. Long-term Outcomes of Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Not as Good as Previously Thought. Eur Urol 2020;78:661-9.
    • Authors: Bravi CA, Montorsi F, Briganti A
    • Issue date: 2020 Dec
    • Reply to Thomas Van den Broeck, R. Jeffrey Karnes, and Steven Joniau's Letter to the Editor re: Amar U. Kishan, Talha Shaikh, Pin-Chieh Wang, et al. Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Gleason Score 9-10 Prostate Adenocarcinoma Treated With Radiotherapy or Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-institutional Comparative Analysis. Eur Urol 2017;71:766-73.
    • Authors: Kishan AU, Steinberg ML, Kupelian PA, King CR
    • Issue date: 2017 Nov
    • Reply to Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Salonia, and Alberto Briganti's Letter to the Editor re: Lisa Moris, Marcus G. Cumberbatch, Thomas Van den Broeck, et al. Benefits and Risks of Primary Treatments for High-risk Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: An International Multidisciplinary Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2020;77:614-27.
    • Authors: Moris L, Mottet N, Wiegel T, EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel
    • Issue date: 2020 Nov
    • Re: Thomas Van den Broeck, Roderick C.N. van den Bergh, Nicolas Arfi, et al. Prognostic Value of Biochemical Recurrence Following Treatment with Curative Intent for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2019;75:967-87.
    • Authors: Zhou X, Han X
    • Issue date: 2019 Jul
    • Re: Carlo A. Bravi, Nicoal Fossati, Giorgio Gandaglia, et al. Long-term Outcomes of Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Not as Good as Previously Thought. Eur Urol 2020;78:661-9.
    • Authors: Achard V, Dal Pra A, Zilli T
    • Issue date: 2020 Dec
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.