Clinically viable gene expression assays with potential for predicting benefit from MEK inhibitors.
Authors
Brant, RSharpe, A
Liptrot, Tom
Dry, J
Harrington, E
Barrett, J
Whalley, N
Womack, C
Smith, P
Hodgson, D
Affiliation
Translational Science, Oncology iMED, AstraZeneca, MacclesfieldIssue Date
2017-03-15
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Purpose: To develop a clinically viable gene expression assay to measure RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK (RAS-ERK) pathway output suitable for hypothesis testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinical studies.Experimental Design: A published MEK functional activation signature (MEK signature) that measures RAS-ERK functional output was optimized for NSCLC in silico NanoString assays were developed for the NSCLC optimized MEK signature and the 147-gene RAS signature. First, platform transfer from Affymetrix to NanoString, and signature modulation following treatment with KRAS siRNA and MEK inhibitor, were investigated in cell lines. Second, the association of the signatures with KRAS mutation status, dynamic range, technical reproducibility, and spatial and temporal variation was investigated in NSCLC formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPET) samples.Results: We observed a strong cross-platform correlation and modulation of signatures in vitro Technical and biological replicates showed consistent signature scores that were robust to variation in input total RNA; conservation of scores between primary and metastatic tumor was statistically significant. There were statistically significant associations between high MEK (P = 0.028) and RAS (P = 0.003) signature scores and KRAS mutation in 50 NSCLC samples. The signatures identify overlapping but distinct candidate patient populations from each other and from KRAS mutation testing.Conclusions: We developed a technically and biologically robust NanoString gene expression assay of MEK pathway output, compatible with the quantities of FFPET routinely available. The gene signatures identified a different patient population for MEK inhibitor treatment compared with KRAS mutation testing. The predictive power of the MEK signature should be studied further in clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res; 23(6); 1471-80. ©2016 AACRSee related commentary by Xue and Lito, p. 1365.Citation
Clinically viable gene expression assays with potential for predicting benefit from MEK inhibitors. 2017, 23 (6):1471-1480 Clin Cancer ResJournal
Clinical Cancer ResearchDOI
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0021PubMed ID
27733477Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1078-0432ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0021
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Phase I expansion and pharmacodynamic study of the oral MEK inhibitor RO4987655 (CH4987655) in selected patients with advanced cancer with RAS-RAF mutations.
- Authors: Zimmer L, Barlesi F, Martinez-Garcia M, Dieras V, Schellens JH, Spano JP, Middleton MR, Calvo E, Paz-Ares L, Larkin J, Pacey S, Venturi M, Kraeber-Bodéré F, Tessier JJ, Eberhardt WE, Paques M, Guarin E, Meresse V, Soria JC
- Issue date: 2014 Aug 15
- The potential utility of re-mining results of somatic mutation testing: KRAS status in lung adenocarcinoma.
- Authors: Biernacka A, Tsongalis PD, Peterson JD, de Abreu FB, Black CC, Gutmann EJ, Liu X, Tafe LJ, Amos CI, Tsongalis GJ
- Issue date: 2016 May
- The comparison between dual inhibition of mTOR with MAPK and PI3K signaling pathways in KRAS mutant NSCLC cell lines.
- Authors: Dogan Turacli I, Ozkan AC, Ekmekci A
- Issue date: 2015 Dec
- The HSP90 inhibitor, NVP-AUY922, sensitizes KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with intrinsic resistance to MEK inhibitor, trametinib.
- Authors: Park KS, Oh B, Lee MH, Nam KY, Jin HR, Yang H, Choi J, Kim SW, Lee DH
- Issue date: 2016 Mar 1
- A CRISPR screen identifies MAPK7 as a target for combination with MEK inhibition in KRAS mutant NSCLC.
- Authors: Dompe N, Klijn C, Watson SA, Leng K, Port J, Cuellar T, Watanabe C, Haley B, Neve R, Evangelista M, Stokoe D
- Issue date: 2018